FCC focuses on instant messaging in AOL Time Warner approval

The growing importance of instant messaging and its possible future as a major means of communication emerged as one of the top issues in the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's deliberations on the multibillion-dollar merger of America Online Inc. and Time Warner Inc., FCC commissioners said yesterday.

The FCC imposed several conditions on AOL Time Warner in the field of instant messaging that are designed to avoid a repeat of today's situation, in which proprietary instant messaging systems have proliferated and interoperability is almost nonexistent. This means users of each instant messaging system can communicate only with others using the same system and they must install multiple pieces of software if they want to be reached by everyone. The FCC approved the merger yesterday (see story).

"Many Americans today are discovering the benefits of instant messaging," said FCC Chairman William Kennard. "We are concerned that we create an open, competitive environment for instant messaging services, and to do this we must have interoperability of what we call the names and presence database."

The database, which Kennard said is like the set of telephone numbers to which everyone must have access to communicate by phone, is the directory of instant messaging users. It also shows their status under such categories as online, off-line and temporarily away.

Kennard said the FCC is concerned that AOL's dominance in text-based instant messaging not lead to a dominance of future broadband instant messaging services offered to Time Warner Cable subscribers. AOL operates its own AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) service and acquired the ICQ service.

To combat this, the FCC set two conditions that it hopes will ensure that users of AOL Time Warner cable systems aren't forced to use proprietary systems.

The provisions center on demonstrating that interoperability exists between AOL Time Warner's future advanced instant messaging system and competing systems, or that subscribers have alternative systems available to them.

Interoperability has emerged as the single biggest issue in the world of current text-based instant messaging. On the Internet, where common standards are almost universal, the proprietary nature of instant messaging has created a stir. Since the advent of the Internet, open standards have ensured that thousands of computer networks can communicate and applications such as e-mail have operated independent of computer and software platforms.

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), a loose group of computer engineers that together decide Internet standards, is working on an interoperability system, while two other groups are proceeding with their own approaches (see story). IMUnified, a group of messaging and technology vendors, is working toward publishing its own specification for interoperability. Aimster, a peer-to-peer file-sharing system, lets its users exchange messages with users on multiple platforms.

The efforts to forge a common standard come after a series of skirmishes in the field.

Several rival instant messaging service vendors previously have attempted to give their users access to AOL's AIM service, among them Microsoft Corp., iCast Corp., Odigo Inc. and Tribal Voice Inc. Each time a competing system offered access to the AIM service, AOL shut it out, citing security concerns.

"Odigo [and other instant messaging providers] have attempted unauthorized access," Tricia Primrose, a spokeswoman for AOL, told IDG News Service in June, after the company blocked Odigo. "We consider it, essentially, [as] hacking; we want to protect members' privacy and security."

Instant messaging operators were cautious in issuing comment on the FCC's provisions late Thursday. "Most of the instant messaging companies will comment tomorrow, because reviewing the details of the order will take some time," said Estela Mendoza, a spokeswoman for Excite@Home Inc. "The devil's in the details, and we'll really have to wait until then before making a statement."

FCC Commissioner Gloria Tristani said the provisions imposed could have been a lot harsher.

Calling instant messaging "an essential platform for the development of future high-speed Internet-based services that rely on real-time delivery and interaction," Tristani said that she had advocated more forceful conditions aimed at achieving interoperability but that those imposed "go a long way to protect consumers."

Related stories:

Copyright © 2001 IDG Communications, Inc.

7 inconvenient truths about the hybrid work trend
Shop Tech Products at Amazon