IT Efforts to Help Determine Election Successes, Failures: Dems deploy data tools; GOP expands microtargeting use

Perhaps the only issue that sparring Democrats and Republicans can agree on prior to tomorrow’s midterm elections is the increasing importance of using technology to better target specific voters.

The Democratic National Committee has spent $8 million since the 2004 presidential election to overhaul its core voter database as part of an effort to eradicate major data quality problems.

Also over the past two years, the Republican National Committee, acknowledged by both parties to have better exploited IT in recent elections, has expanded its use of a data mining and modeling technique called microtargeting, which adds consumer data to voter files to better identify potential voters.

Ben Self, the DNC’s director of technology, said the Democratic Party’s data quality problems in 2004 included a database with a list of Colorado voters that contained more names than the total population of the state. Also, some Florida voters were listed in the database as living in the city “Fort” and the state “Lauderdale,” Self noted.

Microtargeting, Step by Step

•  Acquire traditional demographic voter data like name, address and voting history.•  Conduct a poll to find groups of people with similar opinions on issues like religion, taxes or gun ownership.•  Use modeling tools to add consumer data, like buying behavior, to the poll results.•  Next, use modeling tools to identify patterns that can be used to identify large groups of voters throughout a state who are likely to vote a certain way. For example, one result of microtargeting is that Republicans are likely to drink bourbon, while Democrats favor gin.•  Assign volunteers to call or visit those whose tastes indicate that a vote for that party's candidate is likely.

“We had some significant problems in 2004 that required us to start [rebuilding] technologically from ground zero,” he said. “We have spent a significant portion of our time revamping the entire national database from the ground up.”

As it began anew, the DNC was able to take advantage of emerging technologies, such as a data warehouse appliance from Netezza Corp. in Framingham, Mass., Self said. The committee replaced a MySQL open-source database with a dedicated device that includes high-performance hardware with database, storage and other software, he said.

The Netezza appliance allows the DNC to process the 200 million files — one for each voter — and 900 fields for each file 20 times faster than it could in the past, Self said. Since the overhaul, the DNC has increased the number of high-quality phone numbers in its database by 20%, he said.

The committee has also installed data modeling tools from SPSS Inc., data quality tools from Firstlogic Inc. (acquired by Business Objects SA earlier this year), and extract, transform and load tools from Sunopsis SA (acquired by Oracle Corp. last month).

‘Secret Weapon’

The Republicans’ expertise in microtargeting — appending consumer-based information to the demographic and voting history in a voter database — was important in the 2004 election and will be even more crucial in tomorrow’s elections if the outcomes are as close as expected, said Mike Connell, president, chief political strategist and CEO of New Media Communications Inc. in Richfield, Ohio.

Connell worked with the Bush/Cheney campaign on Internet strategy in 2000 and 2004. His company works for the RNC.

“In one regard, [microtargeting] is probably hands down the single most important secret weapon that the Republican Party has right now,” Connell said. “We’re going to find out here in just a few days what that counts for.”

Anuzis: Microtargeting identifies potential crossover votes.

Anuzis: Microtargeting identifies potential crossover votes.In Michigan, for example, Republican volunteers are canvassing door to door in Detroit for the first time since 1962 because microtargeting has identified 44,000 traditional Democratic voters who are likely to side with Republicans on social issues, said Saul Anuzis, chairman of the Michigan Republican Party.

Before the use of microtargeting, the party would not campaign in areas of the state where less than 50% of the people voted Republican, Anuzis said. “Now, we literally target household by household,” he said. “Michigan is a swing state, and [we] cannot afford not to talk to every single potential voter in the state.”

The RNC did not respond to an interview request by press time.

For its part, the DNC has launched a microtargeting pilot effort in six states using its new IT equipment, Self said. He declined to identify the states but said, “The changes we have made are making a direct impact.”

Separately, Harold Ickes, deputy White House chief of staff for former President Bill Clinton, founded Catalist, a Washington-based consulting firm that maintains Democratic voter data. The company is providing data to America Votes, a Washington-based coalition of interest groups, for use in microtargeting efforts that are independent of the DNC, in Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wyoming and Colorado.

Daniel Castleman, a political data analyst at America Votes, said his organization — which uses development and modeling tools from SPSS — has been able to “surgically target” voters, especially in rural areas, where Democrats have traditionally had little success.

See more Election 2006 coverage:

  •  E-voting state by state: What you need to know

  •  Laws, lingo and technologies

  •  Major players: the vendors

  •  Review: Hacking Democracy

  •  Sound Off: Your comments on e-voting in 2006

Copyright © 2006 IDG Communications, Inc.

It’s time to break the ChatGPT habit
Shop Tech Products at Amazon