Trade group: Congress should ditch Net neutrality to help e-health grow

'Nonsense,' says Public Knowledge's Art Brodsky

U.S. lawmakers should avoid passing Net neutrality laws so electronic-health initiatives can move forward, a trade group representing Internet service providers said today.

E-health and telemedicine applications will need to have priority routing over broadband networks to function properly, said David McClure, president and CEO of the U.S. Internet Industry Association (USIIA), which represents broadband providers and other Internet-based companies. Any legislation that would prohibit providers from prioritizing network traffic would be detrimental to e-health initiatives, he said.

"We need to be able to prioritize emergency information," McClure added. "If not, [e-health applications would] have to compete with downloads from YouTube or peer-to-peer networks."

McClure's comments about Net neutrality came during a press conference to announce the USIIA's new report on ways to accelerate e-health programs. The trade group also called on the U.S. government to enter into more partnerships with private companies and to reform the U.S. Rural Utility Service loan program, which helps bring broadband to rural areas.

Consumer advocacy groups such as Public Knowledge and Free Press have pushed Congress to pass Net neutrality rules in recent years. Net neutrality rules would prohibit broadband providers from blocking or slowing Web content from competitors. Net neutrality advocates say large broadband providers shouldn't be able to give priority to an e-health application from a partner company and not give the same bandwidth to a competing e-health application.

Art Brodsky, spokesman for Public Knowledge, called the USIIA's concerns "nonsense."

"What Net neutrality strives to prohibit is favoritism," Brodsky said in an e-mail. "We don't want Kaiser [for example] to be the exclusive health-care provider [on AT&T's network], so that customers of Aetna can't get the same monitoring services and the same emergency priority."

Asked if the USIIA would accept a Net neutrality law if it had an exception for e-health prioritization, McClure said e-health companies wouldn't be the only ones asking for exceptions. Others would request prioritization for 911 emergency voice traffic or other content, he said.

"How many carve-outs do we have to have?" he said.

The USIIA report says e-health programs are moving forward, but they could progress faster with some additional government actions and resources. The U.S. government can drive e-health standards forward for a medical industry that's "entrenched" in old practices, McClure said. At the same time, new technologies need a legislative push, he added.

"As the medical arts have advanced, so has their need for bandwidth," the report says. "Medical records have become more extensive, and need to be accessed by more parties simultaneously. Digital images have become clearer, but also larger."

Copyright © 2007 IDG Communications, Inc.

7 inconvenient truths about the hybrid work trend
Shop Tech Products at Amazon