Gmail vs. Traditional E-Mail: Savings Adding Up

A new Forrester Research report reveals how much cheaper Web-based e-mail, such as Google's Gmail, is in comparison with traditional e-mail installed on-premises for businesses with up to 15,000 users. But analysts warn that most enterprises won't be making a wholesale switch to Web-based messaging for years to come. Instead, they might pursue a hybrid model, where they move some e-mail services to the cloud and keep some on-premises.

For typical information workers, Forrester estimates that it costs a company $25.18 per user per month for an on-premises e-mail system, including the hardware, labor and other costs associated with managing e-mail in-house. Alternatively, for companies using Google's fully Web-based Gmail, it costs a mere $8.47. Microsoft Exchange Online, Microsoft's version of a fully cloud-based e-mail, isn't quite as cheap as Gmail, but rings in at $20.32 per user per month.

The research was based on a survey of 53 enterprise-size companies in both Europe and North America.

According to Ted Schadler, a Forrester analyst, many companies underestimate the cost of their on-premises e-mail, which should include staffing, maintenance, storage, archiving, mobile access and financing. All of those costs are typically included when you get the per-user per-month price with cloud-based e-mail.

"The market for cloud-based e-mail will just keep getting bigger as a result," he says. "There is greater transparency in what it will cost because it's pay as you go."

But many enterprises aren't likely to go all the way just yet. In fact, most (56%) plan to use a hybrid of on-premises and external e-mail services. According to Schadler, under this model, a company might manage servers that host people's mailboxes, but outsource archiving and filtering to a third-party provider. Only 19% of respondents said they plan to move to a hosted or managed e-mail provider in full.

Even if enterprises underestimate the price of managing e-mail on-premises, the issue of cost is at the forefront of enterprise IT professionals as they consider a new model for messaging delivery. About 42% said there will be an "evolution or change" because "e-mail is getting too expensive." Another 31% said they would change due to consolidation or changing products.

One reason to consider switching? Schadler says getting e-mail off your plate allows IT to worry about more business-critical projects.

"Having your staff keep up with these e-mail upgrades is very labor-intensive," he says. "Why would you want to deal with it if you don't have to? Maybe your staff could worry about improving Web site analytics or implementing social software."

Schadler expects the vendor landscape to continue to mature in the coming year, in part because of enterprises' need to save money, but also because Microsoft launched Exchange Online a couple months ago, which in many ways validated the fully online e-mail delivery model.

More on CIO.com:

This story, "Gmail vs. Traditional E-Mail: Savings Adding Up" was originally published by CIO.

Copyright © 2009 IDG Communications, Inc.

7 inconvenient truths about the hybrid work trend
Shop Tech Products at Amazon