
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Security Stories
May 21, 2004 (Computerworld) -- The theft of proprietary operating system source code from Cisco Systems Inc. poses a potentially serious security threat to corporate networks that use the company's technology, users and analysts said.
And the paucity of information released by the networking giant this week in the wake of the theft is raising troubling questions about what exactly happened and the real extent of the compromise, they said.
"We are all waiting to hear what Cisco has to say," said Stephen Smith, network manager at Keystone Mercy Health Plan in Philadelphia.
Cisco has been "unnaturally and unproductively quiet," said John Pescatore, an analyst at Gartner Inc. "That gives the impression that they are still unsure about the scope of the breach. Or they are sure, and it's much worse than has come out so far."
Unidentified attackers stole an unspecified amount of source code for Cisco's Internetworking Operating System 12.3 and 12.3T software, which is widely used in switches and other networking equipment (see story). A Russian Web site posted about 13MB of what it claimed was the stolen code last Saturday, saying that as much as 800MB of code appeared to have been stolen.
Alexander Antipov, a security expert at Moscow-based Positive Technologies, which owns the Web site that posted the stolen code, claimed that the company downloaded it via a link provided over an Internet Relay Chat channel by someone using the online name Franz.
The supposed Cisco code samples, a copy of which was sent to Computerworld, was removed from the Web site at Cisco's request on May 18, Antipov said.
In a statement posted on its Web site, Cisco confirmed that a "portion" of IOS code had been illegally copied and publicly posted for several days. It appeared that the occurrence wasn't the result of flaw in any Cisco product or service, the note said. It also was unlikely that the action was taken by a Cisco employee or contractor.
The company refused to provide further details, citing an ongoing investigation into the matter, but said it believed that "the improper publication of this information does not create increased risk to customers' Cisco equipment."
"We will continue to closely monitor this matter and provide updates as appropriate to customers," a company spokesman said.
The theft raises security concerns, especially since Cisco's technology is widely used on corporate networks, users said.
"Now that the code is available to scrutinize, it will be easier to find holes to exploit," said Jon Duren, chief technology officer at IdleAire Technologies Corp., a Knoxville, Tenn.-based provider of electrification services. "This issue has caused [us] to re-evaluate our access control lists on the routers, and on devices surrounding our routers, to ensure that they are solid."
A similar incident involving the theft of Microsoft Corp. source code for Windows NT and Windows 2000 in February led to the discovery of a remotely executable flaw in the company's Internet Explorer browser software (see story).
The stolen Cisco code could be investigated for similar flaws or somehow exploited to create back doors or to fool users into downloading malicious patches or Trojan horse programs, security experts said.
In the Microsoft incident, the stolen code was freely available for download. In contrast, the Cisco source code hasn't resurfaced following its brief public airing on the Russian Web site.
Another difference between the two incidents is that the Cisco source code could be a lot more difficult to exploit than the Microsoft code, which was "complete and reasonably easy to work with," said Johannes Ullrich, chief technology officer at the SANS Internet Storm Center in Quincy, Mass.
"Just the same, we still have to be aware of the possibility of a security issue arising as a result of the theft," said Edward York, CTO at 724 Inc., an application service provider in Lompoc, Calif.
This is especially true given the lack of information coming from Cisco, users and analysts said. Gartner's Pescatore noted that the question that always gets raised when incidents such as this occur is, "If this got out, what else was going on?"
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone Enterprise Solutions Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone The Data Center Management Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|



Security Management ZoneSecurity management is the process of developing a comprehensive data protection plan. It takes into account all potential threats, the existing network environment, the future needs of the organization, and lays out a multi-tiered blueprint to integrate the security technology needed to combat these threats. CDW can help keep your network and data secure. Visit the CDW Security Management Zone now See All Zones
|
Fired up about IT? Join Sharkbait and share your true tales of IT. SharkBait is the place for you to sound off about everything IT the good, the bad, and the rest of the weird stuff you deal with every day.New baits |

"Security Directions" virtual trade show2008's Code-Red Security Issues for Protecting the EnterpriseWebcasts, white papers, demos, and more. Presented in a unique 3-d environment. Enter our show right now! Click here to enter
|

In SecurityThere's plenty of talk about how to behave during a Customs search of your computer and gear, but Jon Espenschied's got tips for securing your data (and privacy) before you reach the border. Click here to read the latest column by Jon Espenschied |
![]() |
Layered Security Solutions
Although basic network security issues have changed very little over the past decade, the
network security landscape has changed dramatically. Today's IT professionals still have the
primary responsibility of protecting the confidentiality of corporate information, preventing
unauthorized access, and defending the network against attacks. Security experts and analysts agree that a security solution comprised of multiple layers is the best defense against today's increasingly sophisticated attacks.Download this white paper
|
Universal Threat Management - Because Conventional UTM is Not Enough!
This white paper, written by Mark Bouchard of Missing Link Security Services, examines the challenges confronting today's enterprises with respect to managing threats on a network. It also discusses the need for "Universal Threat Management", which is a security solution approach for all physical locations within an enterprise that require threat protection.Download this white paper |
Selecting the Right Threat Management Solution
This short demo will guide you through key considerations for selecting a solution to manage threats on a network. Learn about the popularity of Unified Threat Management (UTM), and how it fits into an overall security solution. Explore critical elements of a network-wide solution for multisite and large network-size deployments and identify the four key features of a threat management solution.View this demo
|
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |
