March 21, 2002 (Computerworld) --
The authors of proposed standards on reporting software security holes have withdrawn the document from the Internet's main standards-setting body, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
The proposal was intended to help settle disagreements between software vendors and security experts over how software bugs should be disclosed to the public and fixed (see story).
Vendors say they must be given enough time to fix a problem before its disclosure alerts hackers to the vulnerability. Security researchers, on the other hand, want to get the information to users as soon as possible to pressure software makers to come up with a patch.
Among other things, the proposal would give vendors 30 days to resolve the vulnerability, but it would also allow them to request extensions.
The authors withdrew the proposal from the IETF because there was no consensus among IETF members on the need for such a document, regardless of the methods proposed to handle the disclosure and repair of security vulnerabilities, according to the IETF and the authors, Steve Christey, lead information security engineer at Mitre Corp. in Bedford, Mass., and Chris Wysopal, director of research and development at digital security firm @Stake Inc. in Cambridge, Mass.
"This is just too controversial a document," said Russ Cooper, a moderator of the popular Windows NTBugtraq mailing list and an analyst at TruSecure Corp., a Herndon, Va.-based security firm.
In addition, IETF members weren't pleased that the document, called the "Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure Process," was submitted without getting input from the IETF beforehand. The IETF also maintained that the researchers didn't have enough comment from interested parties outside the organization.
"They didn't want input," said Jeffrey Schiller, area director for security at the IETF. "We're open to input. We're not a rubber stamp."
Christey said he and Wysopal consulted 10 individuals and organizations that were involved in security issues, including Microsoft Corp., while preparing their proposal. He said they planned to consult with the IETF's security area directors before submitting their document to the group, but the proposal was leaked to the press first. So they decided to submit the proposal to the organization for discussion, Christey said.
Schiller also claimed that Microsoft was one of the driving forces behind the document. He said the software maker was trying to protect its interests by proposing a reporting policy that both vendors and security experts would accept, resulting in a document that would be a "happy medium," he said.
A Microsoft spokeswoman, while not commenting on the proposal, confirmed that the company supports the need for a common language that security experts and vendors can use to discuss security vulnerabilities.
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center Register for this complimentary live webcast today! Go to the webcast
Computerworld Executive Bulletin: Building a Robust Antivirus Defense
Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs. (Source: MessageLabs) Antivirus software alone isn't enough to prevent today's speedy, sophisticated virus attacks. Security managers should consider multitiered approaches that include behavior scanning, appliances that check e-mail for worms, and restricting user access to dangerous Web sites. Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs, to learn more. Download this executive briefing
Online Security Issues in Regulated Industries
Download this research paper, free for a limited time, compliments of Webroot! (Source: Webroot Software) In June 2008, Computerworld invited IT and business leaders to participate in a survey on online security initiatives at their organizations. The goal of the survey was to better understand Web and e-mail security issues faced today within the regulated education, financial services, government and health care industries. The following report represents top-line results of that survey. Download this white paper
White Papers
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services.
Security Management Zone
Security management is the process of developing a comprehensive data protection plan. It takes into account all potential threats, the existing network environment, the future needs of the organization, and lays out a multi-tiered blueprint to integrate the security technology needed to combat these threats. CDW can help keep your network and data secure.
Visit the CDW Security Management Zone nowSee All Zones
Fired up about IT?Join Sharkbait and share your true tales of IT. SharkBait is the place for you to sound off about everything IT the good, the bad, and the rest of the weird stuff you deal with every day.
In Security Stripping away the trappings of applications, systems and networks, information is the core asset of most organizations. Our columnist describes how asserting the importance of information governance is crucial to making that asset tangible, addressable and protected.
Click here to read the latest column by Jon Espenschied