January 20, 2006 (Computerworld) --
As senior director of security assurance at Oracle Corp., Duncan Harris is in charge of the company's vulnerability remediation processes. He also manages a team of "ethical hackers" at Oracle's Reading, England, software lab whose job is to find flaws in the vendor's products. Following Oracle's latest quarterly patch release this week (see "Oracle releases patches for 82 flaws"), Harris spoke with Computerworld about the company's patching policies and its relationship with the IT security community. Oracle just announced patches for 82 vulnerabilities. Why so many? Oracle doesn't shy away from fixing flaws publicly through our Critical Patch Updates. We don't hide our internally discovered vulnerabilities. When we discover something internally, we still mention it in our Critical Patch Updates. Other vendors, as the security community knows, may be doing silent fixes. It is something we don't believe in. That is part of the explanation for the large number of vulnerabilities. Certainly, there is also much more attention being paid to Oracle for whatever reason. Critics say Oracle doesn't share enough vulnerability information for users to make proper risk assessments. Why don't you disclose more details? As part of our exercise to work out with customers what the regular schedule for our patches should be, we talked to them about the level of information they required in order to understand sufficiently whether they were affected by a vulnerability and what the impact would be if the vulnerability was exploited. We listened very carefully to that, and we have come up with a system where we identify in risk matrices for every one of our product stacks the nature of each of the vulnerabilities that we fix within a quarterly patch update. We believe that it is sufficient information for our customers. Our advisories are for our customers' benefit. They are not for the benefit of the security community. Are quarterly updates good enough for users? The comparison is quite clearly with Microsoft's monthly updates. You have to remember that Windows updates are clearly aimed at client machines. Oracle has client-side products, some of which are quite important, but our fundamental focus is on the server side. Comparing this to the monthly patching that Microsoft does is like comparing apples and oranges. It really is quite different to have a systems administrator patch a server-side system and a small client.
Why do you think the security community is so unhappy with Oracle? In terms of working with the security community, we work very well with those that are happy to abide by the security vulnerability handling processes, which we have published on our Web site for anyone to see. There are
"Yes, NASA has confirmed that some laptops taken to the International Space Station were infected with an online-gaming password stealing..."
Read more...
"Linux is more secure than most operating systems, but Not if you don't practice basic security measures..."
Read more... Read more Security posts or See all Blogs
Netbooks, ultraportables, mini-notebooks whatever you call them, they've been grabbing headlines. Are they here for the long term or just a flash in the pan?
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center Register for this complimentary live webcast today! Go to the webcast
Computerworld Executive Bulletin: Building a Robust Antivirus Defense
Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs. (Source: MessageLabs) Antivirus software alone isn't enough to prevent today's speedy, sophisticated virus attacks. Security managers should consider multitiered approaches that include behavior scanning, appliances that check e-mail for worms, and restricting user access to dangerous Web sites. Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs, to learn more. Download this executive briefing
Online Security Issues in Regulated Industries
Download this research paper, free for a limited time, compliments of Webroot! (Source: Webroot Software) In June 2008, Computerworld invited IT and business leaders to participate in a survey on online security initiatives at their organizations. The goal of the survey was to better understand Web and e-mail security issues faced today within the regulated education, financial services, government and health care industries. The following report represents top-line results of that survey. Download this white paper
White Papers
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services.
Security Management Zone
Security management is the process of developing a comprehensive data protection plan. It takes into account all potential threats, the existing network environment, the future needs of the organization, and lays out a multi-tiered blueprint to integrate the security technology needed to combat these threats. CDW can help keep your network and data secure.
Visit the CDW Security Management Zone nowSee All Zones
Fired up about IT?Join Sharkbait and share your true tales of IT. SharkBait is the place for you to sound off about everything IT the good, the bad, and the rest of the weird stuff you deal with every day.
In Security Stripping away the trappings of applications, systems and networks, information is the core asset of most organizations. Our columnist describes how asserting the importance of information governance is crucial to making that asset tangible, addressable and protected.
Click here to read the latest column by Jon Espenschied