November 2, 2005 (Computerworld) --
All of you who support software liability, do me this favor -- the next time you see a software developer, just walk up to him and slap him in the face! All this latent hostility is making you come up with really, really bad ideas. You see, liability proponents often hide their discussions of liability behind "evil" big companies such as Microsoft, but the fact remains that they're targeting each and every software developer out there, because every developer codes vulnerabilities into their programs. (By the way, I was just kidding about the whole slap in the face thing.) Every once in a while, the idea of software liability arises in the trade press. Most recently, it was reported that Howard Schmidt suggested liability for individual developers. (This report was later amended to replace "liability" with "accountability"). And Bruce Schneier continues his crusade to make everyone liable for everything with a recent attack on software vendors in his Wiredcolumn. This idea is bad in so many ways, let me count them.
It's unenforceable.
Many liability proponents are the same people who publicly ridicule just about every other regulation on the streets because there is no way to police them, and now they think they have a miracle cure for software development: Just tell everyone they have to develop more secure software.
It will destroy innovation.
Software liability is a huge win for the biggest software companies out there, because they'll be the only ones that can afford the risk and the insurance. Nobody will take chances with new applications or functional uses with lawsuits lurking around every corner. At best, innovation slows to a crawl.
It will destroy open-source.
Imagine volunteering time for an open-source project and being sued because the code you wrote at 4 a.m. is no good. Schneier suggests a "Good Samaritan" rule for open-source because, presumably, they mean well. I don't understand why ego motive makes bad code allowable and profit motive doesn't. Regardless, attempting to discern anybody's motives amounts to a violation of privacy.
It will create an Xbox Internet.
Do you know how many applications and systems have "hooks" in them? In the new era of secure software for everyone (sung to the tune of the national anthem of Soviet Union), nobody's software will integrate with nobody else's. Which of course leads to closed "black-box" (or "green-box") appliances so those large software companies can manage their risk. But hey, if that's what you strive for. ...
It will double prices.
Anyone out there besides the Warez pirates think that software already costs too much? I know I do. And I don't want to pay twice as much to support the insurance industry and legal profession, which will get rich while everyone hopes for their own chance to sue, completely ignorant of being part of the problem in the face of the payday.
It will force lock-in.
Nobody in their right mind would create open file formats or plug-ins or any other interoperable functions. It wouldn't make economic sense to lose control over some set of inputs or program operations.
And, finally -- it won't work.
Plenty of software vulnerabilities today aren't even coding errors; they are features that expose systems in ways we actually want them to (which is why no large company can actually switch from Internet Explorer to Mozilla's Firefox).
"Yes, NASA has confirmed that some laptops taken to the International Space Station were infected with an online-gaming password stealing..."
Read more...
"Linux is more secure than most operating systems, but Not if you don't practice basic security measures..."
Read more... Read more Security posts or See all Blogs
Netbooks, ultraportables, mini-notebooks whatever you call them, they've been grabbing headlines. Are they here for the long term or just a flash in the pan?
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center Register for this complimentary live webcast today! Go to the webcast
Computerworld Executive Bulletin: Building a Robust Antivirus Defense
Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs. (Source: MessageLabs) Antivirus software alone isn't enough to prevent today's speedy, sophisticated virus attacks. Security managers should consider multitiered approaches that include behavior scanning, appliances that check e-mail for worms, and restricting user access to dangerous Web sites. Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs, to learn more. Download this executive briefing
Online Security Issues in Regulated Industries
Download this research paper, free for a limited time, compliments of Webroot! (Source: Webroot Software) In June 2008, Computerworld invited IT and business leaders to participate in a survey on online security initiatives at their organizations. The goal of the survey was to better understand Web and e-mail security issues faced today within the regulated education, financial services, government and health care industries. The following report represents top-line results of that survey. Download this white paper
White Papers
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services.
Security Management Zone
Security management is the process of developing a comprehensive data protection plan. It takes into account all potential threats, the existing network environment, the future needs of the organization, and lays out a multi-tiered blueprint to integrate the security technology needed to combat these threats. CDW can help keep your network and data secure.
Visit the CDW Security Management Zone nowSee All Zones
Fired up about IT?Join Sharkbait and share your true tales of IT. SharkBait is the place for you to sound off about everything IT the good, the bad, and the rest of the weird stuff you deal with every day.
In Security Stripping away the trappings of applications, systems and networks, information is the core asset of most organizations. Our columnist describes how asserting the importance of information governance is crucial to making that asset tangible, addressable and protected.
Click here to read the latest column by Jon Espenschied