
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Security Stories
July 20, 2005 (IDG News Service) -- WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Homeland Security needs to develop a recovery plan for widespread attack on the Internet, and it needs stable leadership in cybersecurity, a government investigator told a U.S. Senate subcommittee yesterday.
While the DHS can track Internet threats, it doesn't have an Internet recovery plan or a national cybersecurity threat assessment, said David Powner, director of IT management at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). The DHS is making progress but more work needs to be done, he told a subcommittee of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
"Until DHS addresses its many challenges ... it cannot function as a cybersecurity focal point for coordinating federal law and policy," Powner added. "The result is an increased risk, and large portions of our critical infrastructure are unprepared to effectively handle a cybersecurity attack."
Senators echoed Powner's criticisms, first outlined in a GAO report released in May.
"The United States does not currently have a robust ability to detect a coordinated attack on our critical infrastructure, nor does it have a measurable recovery and reconstitution plan for key mechanisms of the Internet and telecommunications system," said Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican and chairman of the Federal Financial Management, Government Information and International Security Subcommittee.
The DHS is working hard to improve the nation's cybersecurity efforts, said Andy Purdy, acting director of the DHS National Cyber Security Division. Purdy outlined several efforts under way at DHS. A draft of a national infrastructure vulnerability assessment, including a cybersecurity assessment, should be completed within a couple of months, and the DHS Internet Disruption Working Group is working on a plan for Internet recovery after a major attack, he said.
The cyber division is also supporting efforts to push IPv6, a more secure version of the current Internet Protocol, Purdy said. The division is encouraging software vendors to create more secure products, and it plans to renew efforts to work with other agencies and private companies to identify the most significant cyber attack possibilities, he said.
Purdy also noted that DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff announced last week that he would create a new position, an assistant secretary for cyber and telecommunications security. Purdy told senators that a new high-level cybersecurity leader should end high turnover in the cyber division's leadership, and the new assistant secretary will "accelerate" cybersecurity efforts.
"We believe [the GAO report] has provided a fair assessment of the progress to date and agree that while considerable work has been done, much work remains to meet the challenges in this rapidly changing area," Purdy said.
Sen. Thomas Carper, a Delaware Democrat, repeated longtime complaints that cybersecurity issues have taken a back seat to physical security issues at DHS.
"The importance of cybersecurity is often times overlooked in the discussion of homeland security," Carper said. "Cybersecurity plays an important role in the protection of our critical infrastructure."
An attack on cyber infrastructure combined with an attack on physical infrastructure like a railroad could cripple emergency response, Carper said. Senators also raised concerns about the possibility of attacks on Internet-based controls for utilities such as waste management plants or the electric grid.
Powner listed a number of criticisms of the DHS cyber efforts, including what the GAO sees as a difficulty to develop relationships with other federal agencies, with state and local governments, and with private industry. DHS also has no generally accepted methodologies for analyzing Internet attacks, and it has not fully developed a plan to respond to such attacks on utility control systems, Powner said.
Asked if terrorists had capabilities to cause major Internet disruptions, Powner said organized crime and foreign intelligence groups seem to be involved in cybercrime, but he wasn't sure about current activities of terrorist groups.
"If we have a major disruption in the Internet today, the question is, who is in charge of reconstituting the Internet," Powner added.
"Who is?" Coburn asked.
"Multiple players, I think, is the answer," Powner said.
Purdy seemed to disagree, saying DHS would coordinate the rebuilding of the Internet after a major attack.
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone Enterprise Solutions Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone The Data Center Management Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|



Security Management ZoneSecurity management is the process of developing a comprehensive data protection plan. It takes into account all potential threats, the existing network environment, the future needs of the organization, and lays out a multi-tiered blueprint to integrate the security technology needed to combat these threats. CDW can help keep your network and data secure. Visit the CDW Security Management Zone now See All Zones
|
Fired up about IT? Join Sharkbait and share your true tales of IT. SharkBait is the place for you to sound off about everything IT the good, the bad, and the rest of the weird stuff you deal with every day.New baits |

"Security Directions" virtual trade show2008's Code-Red Security Issues for Protecting the EnterpriseWebcasts, white papers, demos, and more. Presented in a unique 3-d environment. Enter our show right now! Click here to enter
|

In SecurityThere's plenty of talk about how to behave during a Customs search of your computer and gear, but Jon Espenschied's got tips for securing your data (and privacy) before you reach the border. Click here to read the latest column by Jon Espenschied |
![]() |
Layered Security Solutions
Although basic network security issues have changed very little over the past decade, the
network security landscape has changed dramatically. Today's IT professionals still have the
primary responsibility of protecting the confidentiality of corporate information, preventing
unauthorized access, and defending the network against attacks. Security experts and analysts agree that a security solution comprised of multiple layers is the best defense against today's increasingly sophisticated attacks.Download this white paper
|
Universal Threat Management - Because Conventional UTM is Not Enough!
This white paper, written by Mark Bouchard of Missing Link Security Services, examines the challenges confronting today's enterprises with respect to managing threats on a network. It also discusses the need for "Universal Threat Management", which is a security solution approach for all physical locations within an enterprise that require threat protection.Download this white paper |
Selecting the Right Threat Management Solution
This short demo will guide you through key considerations for selecting a solution to manage threats on a network. Learn about the popularity of Unified Threat Management (UTM), and how it fits into an overall security solution. Explore critical elements of a network-wide solution for multisite and large network-size deployments and identify the four key features of a threat management solution.View this demo
|
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |
