
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Spam, Malware and Vulnerabilities Stories
January 20, 2006 (Computerworld) -- As senior director of security assurance at Oracle Corp., Duncan Harris is in charge of the company's vulnerability remediation processes. He also manages a team of "ethical hackers" at Oracle's Reading, England, software lab whose job is to find flaws in the vendor's products. Following Oracle's latest quarterly patch release this week (see "Oracle releases patches for 82 flaws"), Harris spoke with Computerworld about the company's patching policies and its relationship with the IT security community.
Oracle just announced patches for 82 vulnerabilities. Why so many? Oracle doesn't shy away from fixing flaws publicly through our Critical Patch Updates. We don't hide our internally discovered vulnerabilities. When we discover something internally, we still mention it in our Critical Patch Updates. Other vendors, as the security community knows, may be doing silent fixes. It is something we don't believe in. That is part of the explanation for the large number of vulnerabilities. Certainly, there is also much more attention being paid to Oracle for whatever reason.
Critics say Oracle doesn't share enough vulnerability information for users to make proper risk assessments. Why don't you disclose more details? As part of our exercise to work out with customers what the regular schedule for our patches should be, we talked to them about the level of information they required in order to understand sufficiently whether they were affected by a vulnerability and what the impact would be if the vulnerability was exploited. We listened very carefully to that, and we have come up with a system where we identify in risk matrices for every one of our product stacks the nature of each of the vulnerabilities that we fix within a quarterly patch update. We believe that it is sufficient information for our customers. Our advisories are for our customers' benefit. They are not for the benefit of the security community.
Are quarterly updates good enough for users? The comparison is quite clearly with Microsoft's monthly updates. You have to remember that Windows updates are clearly aimed at client machines. Oracle has client-side products, some of which are quite important, but our fundamental focus is on the server side. Comparing this to the monthly patching that Microsoft does is like comparing apples and oranges.
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone Enterprise Solutions Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone The Data Center Management Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|



| XenServer FREE trial Citrix XenServer is the simplest and most effective way to virtualize and provision servers. XenServer combines comprehensive server virtualization capabilities with unparalleled scalability, performance, economics, and ease-of-use. Based on the open source Xen hypervisor, XenServer delivers fast performance, easy management, and advanced features such as live migration. |

| Try Fluke Networks'
EtherScope Analyzer on your network FREE Quickly solve the wide range of problems you encounter - 10, 100 and Gigabit, twisted pair and optical fiber, LAN or wireless LAN. The EtherScope Analyzer combines the essential tools you need to monitor network traffic and switch interfaces, discover devices, networks, VLANs, access points, mobile clients and more. See the power of this portable network analyzer on your network. Request free trial now
*Terms and conditions: Evaluation units are available only for a limited time and will be scheduled on a first-come first-served basis. Not available in all geographies. Limited quantities available; customers requesting evaluation units may be waitlisted for the next available unit. It will be at the discretion of Fluke Networks to accept or decline requests for this free evaluation. |
![]() |
![]() 2008 Internet Security Trends Report
For a time, security controls designed to manage spam, viruses, and malware were working. Loud, high-impact attacks abated. But, as a result of this success, the threats they protected against were forced to change. In 2007, many of these threats underwent significant adaptation. Malware went stealth, and the sophistication increased. Download this white paper |
Multi-layer Spam Defense Architectural Overview
Today’s spam attacks have become too sophisticated for earlier-generation spam systems. These systems share a common weakness – relying heavily on analyzing content that can easily be manipulated by spammers. State of the art anti-spam systems must go beyond content examination and analyze messages in the full context in which they are sent.Download this white paper |
Data Loss Prevention Best Practices
Data loss prevention (DLP) is a serious issue for companies, as the number of incidents (and the cost to those experiencing them) continues to increase. Whether it’s a malicious attempt, or an inadvertent mistake, data loss can diminish a company’s brand, reduce shareholder value, and damage the company’s goodwill and reputation.Download this white paper ![]() |
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |

