Skip the navigation

ChoicePoint's error sparks talk of ID theft law

The company reportedly has data on virtually every adult in the U.S.

By Grant Gross
February 23, 2005 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service - The revelation last week that data collector ChoicePoint Inc. has mistakenly given private information on up to 145,000 U.S. residents to identity thieves has led to renewed calls in Washington for a national data privacy law.
On Feb. 16, Alpharetta, Ga.-based ChoicePoint reached agreement with 19 state attorneys general to tell the 145,000 potential victims that ID thieves may have gained access to personal information such as Social Security numbers and credit reports. Potential victims live in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The ChoicePoint problem points to the need for a national privacy law, said representatives of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), which are privacy advocacy groups. For most U.S. companies, the only regulation that calls for notification of victims of ID theft is a California law that requires companies doing business in the state to notify customers if their personal information has been accessed by an unauthorized person. That law went into effect in July 2003.
"There certainly is agreement that we need better notification, exactly because of cases like this," said Ari Schwartz, associate director at the CDT. "We're seeing [data companies] selling it to a lot of different people."
ChoicePoint has access to about 19 billion public records, and the company reportedly has information on virtually every adult living in the U.S.
In addition to calls for legislation from privacy advocates, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has called for congressional hearings on a piece of privacy legislation she introduced this year. Feinstein's Notification of Risk to Personal Data Act, introduced Jan. 24, would require businesses and government agencies to notify a likely victim when there is a "reasonable basis to conclude" that a criminal has obtained unencrypted personal data.
Feinstein's bill lacks co-sponsors, and a similar bill went nowhere in Congress in 2004. Asked about the bill's chances in 2005, a Feinstein spokesman said the ChoicePoint problems have shown the need for legislation.
"Moving any bill is always a difficult prospect, but now more people are coming to an understanding of the issue of identity theft," the spokesman said.
In a statement, Feinstein called for the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold hearings on her bill as soon as possible. "I strongly believe individuals have a right to be notified when their most sensitive information is compromised -- because it is truly their information," she said in the statement. "And they have the right to decide what actions they want to take once a breach has been

Reprinted with permission from Story copyright 2014 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Our Commenting Policies
Internet of Things: Get the latest!
Internet of Things

Our new bimonthly Internet of Things newsletter helps you keep pace with the rapidly evolving technologies, trends and developments related to the IoT. Subscribe now and stay up to date!