Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Sidebar: Where E-voting Went Wrong

October 18, 2004 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - 1. California, 2003: Diebold installs uncertified software without notifying authorities.


2. California, 2004: State Senate committee passes an urgent bill to ban all computerized voting in 2004.


3. California, 2004: Secretary of state decertifies Diebold for November election.


4. Alameda County, 2004: Diebold control modules fail to start up.


5. Orange County, 2004: Hart InterCivic Inc. DREs trip circuit breaker and shut down when batteries die; voters are turned away from the polls.


6. Orange County, 2004: Hart access-code confusion causes 7,000 voters to receive the wrong ballots.


7. San Diego County, 2004: Diebold DREs lose votes; control modules fail to start up properly.


8. Bernalillo County, 2002: Insufficient memory results in failure to count 12,000 of 48,000 votes.


9. Arapahoe County, 2004: Failure to maintain DRE battery charge results in expenditure of more than $100,000 to replace batteries.


10. Dallas County, 2002: Election Systems and Software Inc. (ES&S) iVotronic systems mark incorrect choices on voting screens.


11. Harris County, 2003: Hart DREs don't start; voters must use makeshift paper ballots.


12. Hinds County, 2003: DREs overheat and break down; election invalidated, then reheld.


13. Indiana, 2004: ES&S installs uncertified software on iVotronic system and admits the older, certified version won't tabulate votes.


14. Floyd and Coveta Counties, 2002: Diebold DREs lock up; access cards malfunction; wrong candidates are marked on-screen.


15. Bryan and Terrell Counties, 2002: Diebold DRE ballots display wrong races and omit some altogether.


16. Muscogee County, 2003: DREs register "yes" when voters vote "no."


17. Georgia, 2004: Diebold ballot encoding mix-ups prevent voting in primary.


18. Montgomery County, 2004: Diebold DRE shows incomplete ballot when font is magnified.


19. Sarasota County, 2004: ES&S DREs fail to count 189 votes.


20. Wake County, 2002: ES&S iVotronic software loses 436 ballots.


21. Broward County, 2002: ES&S iVotronic error results in failure to count 22% of the votes.


22. Broward County, 2004: ES&S DREs lose 134 votes; margin is 12 votes.


23. Miami-Dade County, 2002: ES&S iVotronic system fails to count 8.2% of the votes.


24. Miami-Dade county, 2004: Severe audit log bug in ES&S iVotronic system is revealed; it had been detected nearly a year earlier.
















A snapshot of various places around the country where problems with electronic voting systems have been reported.



Where E-Voting Went Wrong





Source: VotersUnite.org



Jump to comments

Security

Additional Resources

Xerox
By using solid ink technology only from Xerox, you could save up to 65% by printing color for the cost of black and white. Enter for a chance to WIN a PhaserTM 8860 network color printer!
Microsoft
Save time and mitigate security risk. Deploy it now.
Sybase
In this white paper, IDC analyzes the role of next-generation mobile enterprise platforms as organizations seek a more strategic deployment of mobile solutions.

Learn the important issues you must consider before starting your next mobility initiative. Get your mobility white paper from IDC now, compliments of Sybase.
 

SAS Information Management Kit

SAS is the leader in business intelligence and analytical software and services. Only SAS offers leading data integration, storage, analytics and business intelligence applications within a comprehensive enterprise intelligence platform. SAS gives 97 of the top 100 companies in the 2007 Fortune 500 THE POWER TO KNOW®.

Webcast: The Information Management Roadmap
Imagine high-quality data, cleansed, analyzed and delivered throughout your organization. Join Computerworld, IT visionary Thornton May and a panel of experts to learn how SAS® can help you make it happen.

View this webcast 
Research Report: Information Management Initiatives at Midsize and Large Organizations
See the top-line results of this Computerworld sponsored survey to see how IT and business leaders are handling information management implementation.

Download this report 
White Paper: Information Management: Better Information for Winning Decisions.
This white paper explains how the SAS Information Evolution Model aids companies in assessing how they use this information to make strategic decisions and drive business.

Download this white paper