Computerworld - It was just last year that the London borough of Newham couldn't afford to upgrade its aging Microsoft Exchange 5.5 server. Then Newham contacted an open-source consulting firm, Netproject, for a study to see whether Linux desktops would be a workable option for the local government. By November, there was a credible Linux plan set for adoption, subject to further negotiations with Microsoft.
Last week, Newham announced a new 10-year, $9 million deal with Microsoft. The local government that couldn't afford an Exchange upgrade will now get that, plus up-to-date desktop software, plus a batch of tablet PCs for the borough's social workers.
Now that's bargaining power.
Officially, Newham's decision was based in large part on a Capgemini study, commissioned by Microsoft, that concluded that Newham would not only save a bundle by staying with Windows, but would also have fewer security problems. Yeah, right.
Unofficially, and much more believably, the deal went down like this: Newham had a viable Linux alternative to Windows (and a lot of press attention for being a highly visible Linux poster child). Microsoft negotiated. Newham ended up with a truckload of goodies that it couldn't afford before.
Pretty slick, eh? True, the Linux advocates say they feel used. They're right -- they were used. All the available evidence suggests that Newham's IT boss, Richard Steel, never really wanted to go through the expense and trouble of dumping Windows and all the other Microsoft products Newham was using in favor of Linux and open-source alternatives.
But when Steel went to negotiate the deal with Microsoft, that competing open-source proposal was on the table. It meant Steel could walk away from Microsoft if he had to. He had the power to say no to anything short of the deal he wanted.
Was it a bluff? Only Steel knows, and he's not saying. But Microsoft believed Newham could go with Linux. Microsoft wasn't willing to take that chance. And that got Newham one heck of a deal.
Think you can't possibly get that kind of leverage in your own dealings with software vendors? You're probably right -- chances are, you don't want that much publicity for any IT-related negotiation.
But can you take a few lessons from the Newham deal? Sure.
Start by remembering that if you can't say no, it's not a negotiation. If you can't walk away from the table, you have no leverage at all.
So be sure you always have a viable alternative when you sit down with a vendor. Maybe that means one or more competitors' products. Maybe it means open-source. Or a
- Study: Total Economic Impact of Google Apps Employees can work faster and IT spending can decrease when companies switch to Google Apps, says a commissioned study by Forrester Consulting. Going...
- Protecting Digitalized Assets in Healthcare Healthcare providers face an urgent, internal battle every day: security and compliance versus productivity and service. For most healthcare organizations, the fight is...
- Is a SaaS Deployment Right for You? Find out the answer and as well as the other deployment options.
- Discover How Mail Express Solves 2 of Your Biggest IT Headaches Email. It can be the source of some of IT's biggest headaches. As it eats up storage and bandwidth, it also opens up...
- Increasing the Value of Your Reports and Dashboards Learn how incorporating other analytical capabilities such as predictive modeling and visualization can increase the value of your reports and dashboards by providing...
- Video surveillance for IT: maximum image quality, minimum bandwidth Join us on Thursday, May 8th at 1 p.m. EST when Willem Ryan, Senior Product Marketing Manager at Avigilon, will discuss how IT... All Management White Papers | Webcasts