Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Macintosh
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Apple Remote Desktop 2 'well worth the money'

August 19, 2004 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - I've been using remote access programs for years: PC Anywhere, NetOctopus, Virtual Network Computing (VNC) and the venerable Timbuktu. These programs are indispensable for system administrators who need access to their servers and desktops without having to be physically near them. It keeps us from spending long hours in a refrigerated server room, and saves company money because we don't need to travel as often to client sites.
When Apple released Apple Remote Desktop 1.0, I was in the process of building several student labs using Mac OS X and thought this would be a good support tool. ARD 1 allowed an administrator to remote-control a machine and provide user support. After an incremental update, ARD 1.2 allowed the administrator to distribute Apple (or third-party) packages (.pkg and .mpkg files). This greatly simplified the process of patching systems and installing applications. I was able to push out a system update to all my boxes over the network quickly and relatively painlessly -- usually in the early morning hours before classes started.
ARD 1.2 had a few quirks, and I was looking forward to ARD 2 for the fixes. So, I got a copy of the software recently, and put it to the test. I liked what I found.
The first thing I noticed was that the user interface is much more elegant than previous versions. It was also oriented toward doing multiple commands in sequence, so there is a command progress window at the bottom. On the left is an option to have multiple lists, which is very handy for those who want to keep their physical locations grouped. The windows just look better.
Apple Remote Desktop 2
The basis for ARD 2's system control has changed since ARD first came out. In Version 1, the product used User Datagram Protocol and operated on Port 3283. ARD 2 can use that same port but also operates using transmission control protocol on the standard VNC port 5900. ARD 2 also allows VNC devices to be controlled from the ARD interface (or for Apple desktops to connect to a VNC server). The most important change at this level from Version 1 is that the application now uses TCP ping to locate computers on the network. If your network blocks this across subnets (as many organizations do to prevent DOS attacks), you have to manually enter the IP addresses of the machines you wish to manage on other subnets or put in place a router rule allowing TCP ping from your master control workstation. The advantage



Jump to comments

Macintosh

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.