E-voting rejected in Ohio
The state is balking at using the technology, citing security concerns
Computerworld - Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell on Friday barred officials in three counties from purchasing electronic voting machines after a second round of security testing showed that the systems still have an unacceptable level of security flaws.
The decision blocks the deployment of e-voting systems from Diebold Election Systems in Hardin, Lorain and Trumbull counties. Thirty-one counties in Ohio have now postponed using e-voting systems until after the November presidential election. Seven counties, however, have already purchased paperless e-voting systems.
"As I made clear last year, I will not place these voting devices before Ohio's voters until identified risks are corrected," Blackwell said. "Diebold Election Systems has successfully addressed many, but not all, of the problems that were identified in our first security review. The lack of comprehensive resolution prevents me from giving county boards of elections a green light for this November."
Will Doherty, executive director of VerifiedVoting.org, a grass-roots organization calling for voter-verifiable paper audit trails for all e-voting systems, applauded Blackwell's decision and said voter-verified paper ballots should be the ballots of record for all voting systems.
"Precinct-based optical scan or other new technologies will likely outstrip the current generation of e-voting machines as the best technology for secure, reliable and transparent elections," he said.
In December, Blackwell released results from two comprehensive examinations that identified 57 potential security risks within the software and hardware of the voting devices manufactured by Diebold, Election Systems & Software Inc., Hart InterCivic Inc. and Sequoia Voting Systems. As a result of that testing, Blackwell ordered the vendors to correct the problems or face a halt in deployment.
Diebold Election Systems was the only vendor to submit revised voting software and hardware for retesting.
Blackwell's decision follows the lead of California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, who on April 30 issued a directive decertifying e-voting systems in 10 counties, pending security improvements. The directive also banned the use of touch-screen systems from Diebold.
For more about this topic, see our E-Voting Special Coverage page.
Read more about Gov't Legislation/Regulation in Computerworld's Gov't Legislation/Regulation Topic Center.
- Enable secure remote access to 3D data without sacrificing visual perfomance Design and manufacturing companies must adapt quickly to the demands of an increasingly global and competitive economy. To speed time to market for...
- The Truth About Virtual Computing for CAD If you're a user of graphics-intensive software such as 3D modeling, simulation and analysis, and visualization, you might be skeptical about moving to...
- Virtually Delivered High Performance 3D Graphics "A picture is worth a thousand words." That old phrase is as true today as it ever was. Pictures (i.e., those with heavy...
- Simplifying Product Design In A Complex World Product design engineering has moved far beyond the confines of ever-more powerful workstations. Companies can't afford to restrict projects to using only local...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Why Are Customers Really Deploying an NGFW? It seems every IT Security expert is talking about the NGFW, but what are people really doing? This webcast covers 5 real-world customer... All Gov't Legislation/Regulation White Papers | Webcasts