DaimlerChrysler responds to SCO lawsuit
It asked a Michigan court to dismiss the suit
IDG News Service - DaimlerChrysler AG has asked a Michigan court to dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by Unix vendor The SCO Group Inc., saying there is "no genuine issue of material fact" in SCO's case.
Last month, SCO filed a lawsuit against the auto manufacturer in the Circuit Court for the County of Oakland, Mich., claiming that DaimlerChrysler had refused to provide "certification of compliance" indicating that it was in compliance with a Unix licensing agreement from November 1990 (see story).
In court filings dated April 15, however, DaimlerChrysler argues that although it has no obligation to provide SCO with the certification, it has indeed done so. "DaimlerChrysler has provided SCO with the only certification required under the license demonstrating that DaimlerChrysler is not even using and has not used the licensed software for more than seven years," the company said.
The filings refer to two letters sent by DaimlerChrysler to Bill Broderick, Lindon, Utah-based SCO's director of software licensing, and dated April 6, said DaimlerChrysler spokeswoman Mary Gauthier.
One of the letters, written by Norman Powell, DaimlerChrysler's senior manager of technology services, and addressed to Unix System Laboratories Inc. in Summit, N.J., certifies that DaimlerChrysler is no longer using the software licensed under a 1990 agreement between Chrysler Motors Corp. and Unix System Laboratories.
The second letter, written by DaimlerChrysler Senior Vice President and CIO Susan Unger and addressed to Broderick, says that SCO has no right to seek such a certification but adds that the first letter "should cause SCO to dismiss its suit."
Novell Inc. acquired Unix System Laboratories and rights to the Unix operating system from AT&T Corp. in 1993. Some of these rights were eventually transferred to SCO, although Novell now claims that it retained copyright to the Unix System V code that SCO also claims to own.
DaimlerChrysler appears to believe that SCO has no rights to its Unix contract as well. "We were rather puzzled when we saw the lawsuit, because we never had any agreement with SCO and never had any knowledge that SCO had assumed the rights to that agreement," said Gauthier.
The carmaker's filings ask the court to "grant summary disposition in its favor and against SCO, and deny SCO its requested relief."
SCO had been seeking damages for what it called "past violations of the DaimlerChrysler Software Agreement."
The fact that DaimlerChrysler has now produced the requested certification is unlikely to end SCO's lawsuit, said Bruce Perens, an open-source advocate who has been following the case.
"I do not expect SCO to willingly drop any lawsuit, nor do I expect them to
- Enable secure remote access to 3D data without sacrificing visual perfomance Design and manufacturing companies must adapt quickly to the demands of an increasingly global and competitive economy. To speed time to market for...
- The Truth About Virtual Computing for CAD If you're a user of graphics-intensive software such as 3D modeling, simulation and analysis, and visualization, you might be skeptical about moving to...
- Virtually Delivered High Performance 3D Graphics "A picture is worth a thousand words." That old phrase is as true today as it ever was. Pictures (i.e., those with heavy...
- Simplifying Product Design In A Complex World Product design engineering has moved far beyond the confines of ever-more powerful workstations. Companies can't afford to restrict projects to using only local...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Why Are Customers Really Deploying an NGFW? It seems every IT Security expert is talking about the NGFW, but what are people really doing? This webcast covers 5 real-world customer... All Linux and Unix White Papers | Webcasts