Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Security
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

How to Build Privacy Into Customer Authentication

April 22, 2004 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - Reports of worsening identity theft are pressuring companies to adopt stronger methods of making sure they know the identity of their customers. Most customers will find this additional layer of security comforting. But the more invasive authentication methods—biometrics, especially—have people worried that they'll lose their privacy in the process. How can businesses authenticate their customers without scaring them away? By putting the consumer in control throughout the authentication process.


Since 9/11, companies have been re-examining how they confirm that their customers are who they say they are before giving them access to systems and accounts. The 9/11 hijackers showed how easy it was for deadly criminals to pass through society making important transactions using unchecked credentials.


The next time you call your Internet service provider, for example, you'll probably have to pass through two or three filters before you can change your service. The ISP will check its caller ID to verify your phone number and then ask you to verify your name and address, and it may ask for one more piece of information.


For this third piece of information, an emerging trend has been to ask you for the answer to a "secret question" you set up when you open an account, such as a PIN, the name of your pet, your birthplace or your mother's maiden name.


For customers like me who are privacy sticklers, this is a welcome improvement. I'm more certain that an imposter would be lacking all the right pieces of information to break into my account.


If you're not comforted by this trend, you should try the experiment I did last month. I accessed my top 25 accounts and noted what information the companies required from me to gain access. I found that in half of the cases, my favorite businesses required three or more pieces of personal information (see Table 1). This was rarely the case a few years ago.


But not everyone is excited about this development. Giving companies more information is dangerous, privacy advocates say, because no business has perfect security. And all customers have a point at which they'll abandon a registration process if too much information is required. Businesses may already be reaching that tipping point with their heightened authentication.


So how do companies strike the right balance? How can they simultaneously provide the levels of privacy and security that customers want?


There are two ways. First, companies need to adopt a tiered authentication policy. By tiered, I mean that the level of authentication should be directly related to the sensitivity of the account being accessed. The higher the sensitivity, the more credentials should be required (see Table 2). Customers will expect more scrutiny for financial accounts but will reject it for retail accounts.



Jump to comments

Privacy

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.