Intel loses appeal against €1.06 billion European antitrust fine
An EU Court has upheld the European Commission's antitrust judgement against Intel, which has two months to lodge a final appeal
IDG News Service - Intel lost its appeal against a €1.06 billion (US$1.44 billion) antitrust fine on Thursday when the General Court of the European Union upheld a 2009 ruling by the European Commission that the company had abused its dominant market position.
The Commission had found that Intel had abused its dominant position by offering rebates to customers on the condition they buy all their x86 CPUs from the company.
The General Court dismissed in its entirety Intel's appeal and ordered the chip giant to implement conditions imposed by the Commission in its original ruling to rectify the market situation.
According to the Commission, with 70 percent or more of the worldwide market, Intel was an "unavoidable supplier" of CPUs, an essential component of any computer.
Prior to 2000 there were several manufacturers of x86 CPUs. However between 2002 and 2007 when the market abuse took place, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) was the only serious competitor.
Intel granted rebates to computer manufacturers Dell, Lenovo, Hewlett-Packard and NEC, and paid reseller Media-Saturn to sell only computers containing Intel's x86 CPUs, the Commission had found.
According to the court the exclusivity rebates are by their nature designed to restrict the purchaser's freedom to choose alternative suppliers. It is was therefore not necessary for the Commission to show that they restrict competition on a case-by-case basis (through a so-called 'efficient competitor test') as Intel had argued.
The €1.06 billion fine was the highest ever meted out by the Commission and was determined on the basis of the value of sales of x86 CPUs invoiced by Intel in the EU during the last year of the infringement. Intel had argued that it was disproportionate, but the General Court ruled otherwise, noting that the fine is at the lower end of what is allowable in law. €1.06 billion was equivalent to 4.15 percent of Intel's annual turnover, well below the 10 percent of turnover that the Commission could have imposed.
As with other cases brought by the European Commission against U.S. digital giants, the issue of jurisdiction was clarified by the court. The General Court said that EU jurisdiction "can be established on the basis of both the implementation and the effects of the anti-competitive conduct in the European Union."
Intel now has two months in which to challenge the court's decision on points of law by filing an appeal with the Court of Justice of the European Union.
- Enable secure remote access to 3D data without sacrificing visual perfomance Design and manufacturing companies must adapt quickly to the demands of an increasingly global and competitive economy. To speed time to market for...
- The Truth About Virtual Computing for CAD If you're a user of graphics-intensive software such as 3D modeling, simulation and analysis, and visualization, you might be skeptical about moving to...
- Virtually Delivered High Performance 3D Graphics "A picture is worth a thousand words." That old phrase is as true today as it ever was. Pictures (i.e., those with heavy...
- Simplifying Product Design In A Complex World Product design engineering has moved far beyond the confines of ever-more powerful workstations. Companies can't afford to restrict projects to using only local...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Why Are Customers Really Deploying an NGFW? It seems every IT Security expert is talking about the NGFW, but what are people really doing? This webcast covers 5 real-world customer... All Legal White Papers | Webcasts