Phil Schiller up again in next round of Apple-Samsung battle
The Apple executive is one of a handful of people Samsung said it will call to the court
IDG News Service - Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller is among the witnesses that lawyers for Samsung plan to call when the two companies return to court in California in late March.
Schiller was the highest-profile witness to take the stand during the first jury trial in the patent infringement case between the two companies in August 2012 and a partial retrial that last November.
In March, the two companies are due back in court for the next round of their battle. It's a different case involving different phones, but covers much the same ground: allegations of patent infringement by Apple against Samsung for elements of its smartphone design.
"Mr. Schiller will be called to testify regarding design, development, promotion, marketing, advertising, consumer demand for, and sales of the iPhone, iPad, iPod, and other Apple products, including the features accused of infringing the Samsung feature patents, the smartphone and tablet markets, the Apple brand and Apple's marketing and advertising efforts," Samsung said in a filing Thursday with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
In addition to nine expert witnesses, Samsung's lawyers said they plan to call Hiroshi Lockheimer, a vice president of Android engineering at Google, and Todd Pendleton, the marketing chief for Samsung's U.S. telecoms division. Among the people Samsung said it "might" call is Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of iPhone & iOS product marketing.
Schiller also appears on Apple's witness list, which was also filed with the court Thursday.
Other Apple staff the company said it expects to present include Tony Blevins, Apple's vice president of procurement; Gregory Christie, the company's vice president of human interface, and Bruce Watrous, the company's chief IP lawyer. It said it might call Scott Forstall, who was Apple's senior vice president of iOS SoftwareA until late 2012.
Both lists could get pared down before the trial begins. Judge Lucy Koh has imposed a time limit of one-and-a-half hours of opening statements and 25 hours of evidence for each side.
The case is 12-630, Apple v. Samsung, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose.
Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org
- In Apple v. Samsung, it's a 'holy war' for $2B
- A day into the trial, Apple and Samsung already annoying each other
- Supreme Court justices raise questions about software patents
- Phil Schiller up again in next round of Apple-Samsung battle
- Nokia and HTC bury hatchet in patent disputes
- How about them apples: Google and Samsung ink patent deal
- Samsung's Apple damages equal to just 16 days' profit
- Supreme Court to get software patent case
- The latest move to kill bad patents divides tech industry
- Judge refuses to stay Apple-Samsung lawsuit pending patent review
- Path Selection Infographic Path Selection Infographic
- Hyperconvergence Infographic A wide range of observers agree that data centers are now entering an era of "hyperconvergence" that will raise network traffic levels faster...
- Preparing Your Infrastructure for the Hyperconvergence Era From cloud computing and virtualization to mobility and unified communications, an array of innovative technologies is transforming today's data centers.
- How WAN Optimization Helps Enterprises Reduce Costs If you wanted to break down innovation into a tidy equation, it might go something like this: Technology + Connectivity = Productivity. Productivity...
- Cloud Knowledge Vault Learn how your organization can benefit from the scalability, flexibility, and performance that the cloud offers through the short videos and other resources...
- LIVE EVENT: 5/7, The End of Data Protection As We Know It. Introducing a Next Generation Data Protection Architecture. Traditional backup is going away, but where does this leave end-users? All Legal White Papers | Webcasts