Court upholds Motorola import ban in dispute with Microsoft
Motorola Mobility had argued that a Microsoft patent was invalid to avoid an ITC ban
IDG News Service - An appeals court has ruled against a Motorola Mobility bid to declare invalid a Microsoft patent that figures in an import ban by the U.S. International Trade Commission on certain Motorola mobile phones.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Monday also upheld an ITC decision that Microsoft satisfied the domestic industry requirement with regard to the patent, which is important for the ITC to decide on an import ban.
Motorola had asked the appeals court to declare certain asserted claims of the patent invalid and reverse the finding that there is a domestic industry that could be hurt by its infringing products.
U.S. Patent No. 6,370,566 ('566 patent), owned by Microsoft, is titled "generating meeting requests and group scheduling from a mobile device."
Microsoft filed a complaint in the ITC in October 2010 against Motorola in which it alleged that the import and sale of certain Motorola mobile devices infringed nine Microsoft patents, including the '566 patent.
The ITC decided in May to impose a limited exclusion order on imports of Motorola products, which are in infringement of certain claims of the '566 patent. Motorola, which initially contested infringement during the ITC investigation, had later argued that the Apple Newton MessagePad, a prior art personal digital assistant, included a claimed synchronization component. But the ITC did not find "clear and convincing evidence of any synchronization component in the Apple Newton MessagePad," the court observed.
In July, Microsoft sued the U.S Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claiming that the agencies were not enforcing the ban from the ITC. The Redmond, Washington, software company holds that Android uses a number of its technologies and has offered a number of companies license agreements providing coverage under its patent portfolio for Android mobile phones and tablets. Motorola has, however, not signed the agreement.
"We're disappointed with this decision but pleased with the overall outcome," the Google unit said in a statement. "Microsoft lost on 8 of its 'best' patents, and this lone opinion does not impact our ability to build great products that people love." The two companies have patent disputes in various courts.
- 15 Non-Certified IT Skills Growing in Demand
- How 19 Tech Titans Target Healthcare
- Twitter Suffering From Growing Pains (and Facebook Comparisons)
- Agile Comes to Data Integration
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
- HP HAVEn: See the big picture in Big Data HP HAVEn is the industry's first comprehensive, scalable, open, and secure platform for Big Data. Enterprises are drowning in a sea of data...
- What Datapipe customers need to know about the new PCI DSS 3.0 compliance standard This handy quick reference outlines what PCI DSS 3.0 is, who needs to be compliant and how Alert Logic solutions address the new...
- The 12 PCI DSS 3.0 requirements addressed by Peer 1 Hosting This handy quick reference outlines the 12 PCI DSS 3.0 requirements, who needs to be compliant and how Alert Logic solutions address the...
- Defense Throughout the Vulnerability Life Cycle This whitepaper provides insight into how to leverage threat and log management technologies to protect your IT assets throughout their vulnerability life cycle.
- Meg Whitman presents Unlocking IT with Big Data During this Web Event you will hear Meg Whitman, President and CEO, HP discuss HAVEn - the #1 Big Data platform, as well...
- The New Way to Work Knowledge Vault This Knowledge Vault focuses on how, in today's increasingly virtual world, it's more important than ever to engage deeply with employees, suppliers, partners,... All Legal White Papers | Webcasts