Before Google Glass is released, it's already banned
Seattle bar tells customers it's a 'No Google Glass Zone' well ahead of release
Computerworld - Before an official pair has even been released, a Seattle cafe has banned customers from wearing Google's computerized eye glasses inside the business.
While some restaurants have a "No shirt, no shoes, no service," policy, Seattle's 5 Points Cafe and Bar has a no Google Glass policy.
The cafe said in a Monday blog post, "If you're one of the few who are planning on going out and spending your savings on Google Glasses -- what will for sure be a new fad for the fanny-pack wearing, never removing your bluetooth headset-wearing crowd -- plan on removing them before you enter The 5 Point. The 5 Point is officially a No Google Glass zone."
It seems the cafe got a bit of pushback from people may be looking forward to wearing Glass devices while enjoying a cocktail.
One commenter wrote, "Thank God I live in Florida. If I did live in Seattle, I would probably be the first person to violate your ban and let nature take its course. How you can you ban something ahead of its release?"
Another called the cafe "paranoid."
In response, the cafe's management wrote, in part, "Sorry for another post on Google Glasses, but I have to address some of the people mad about our Google Glass ban... If nothing else, we're saving you from looking like a complete idiot in public. You'll be thankful in a few years when your kids grow up and don't have to see photos of you wearing these ridiculous things."
Google is still developing its Glass technology, which is designed to enable users to take photos, shoot video, pull up maps and share images and information on social networks. A transparent interface over the right eye shows options, and the device is manipulated using voice control.
The bar's owner, David Meinert, was unavailable for comment.
Dan Olds, an analyst at Gabriel Consulting Group, said the cafe may get a lot of publicity for banning Glass but added that it doesn't make a lot of sense to take such a position.
"It's quite a surprise to see places ban them before they've even been publicly released," said Olds. "From a practical standpoint, the folks who want to ban Glass would have to ban other devices too if they want to remain consistent. Any phone today can take pictures and record sound almost without detection."
Olds said that, with so many people walking around with smartphones and so many businesses tracking customers' comings and goings, it's a bit late to worry about protecting people's privacy by banning technologies that record audio and video -- even technologies that can do the recording as surreptitiously, and in such an automated fashion, as computerized glasses.
"I'm as creeped out as anyone when I think about someone's glasses automatically recording my every move around them," he added. "But I think that this particular Pandora's box is already open and will be impossible to lock back up."
A few weeks ago, Google put out a call for people to apply to be part of a group of a few thousand who will initially test Glass. Called "explorers," the testers were asked to tell Google how they would use the technology.
Being a tester isn't just a matter of coming up with a good plan for using Google Glass; explorers will be required to shell out $1,500 a piece for a test device, and they'll have to pay to attend a special "pick-up experience" in New York, San Francisco or Los Angeles.
The deadline for applying to be an explorer has passed, and Google has not yet said when it will announce the winners.
Sharon Gaudin covers the Internet and Web 2.0, emerging technologies, and desktop and laptop chips for Computerworld. Follow Sharon on Twitter, at @sgaudin, and on Google+, or subscribe to Sharon's RSS feed . Her email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Read more about Privacy in Computerworld's Privacy Topic Center.
- Best iPhone, iPad Business Apps for 2014
- 14 Tech Conventions You Should Attend in 2014
- 10 Desktop Apps to Power Your Windows PC
- How to Add New Job Skills Without Going Back to School
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
- Review: Box beats Dropbox - and all the rest - for business Box trumps Dropbox, Engyte, Citrix ShareFile, EMC Syncplicity, and OwnCloud with rich mix of file sync, file sharing, user management, deep reporting and...
- Analyst Report-Mixed All Flash Arrays Delivers Safer Higher Performance What is the impact of an all-flash array with enterprise features and reliability on the mainstream data center? In the mainstream environment, storage...
- Embracing Flash Storage Exec Brief Flash storage can deliver impressive performance, especially for random I/O, by eliminating rotational and seek latencies that are common in all hard disk...
- Embracing Tiered Storage Exec Brief All data is not created equal and thus all data need not be treated the same by the storage system. IT executives must...
- Data Protection and Disaster Recovery with iSCSI and VMware Get this on demand webcast now
- Four Myths of High-Productivity App Dev Debunked Debunk the main myths surrounding high-productivity application development and how both platforms have overcome them. All Privacy White Papers | Webcasts