EU let Microsoft police itself on browser ballot promises
Legal critic wonders why regulators put 'a three-time offender' on the honor system
Computerworld - Europe's antitrust agency had put Microsoft on the honor system, letting the company monitor its own compliance with a 2009 settlement that required it to offer other browsers to Windows users, the EU's top regulator admitted.
That eventually led to the Brussels-based European Commission slapping a $732 million fine on Microsoft today.
"The reports we were receiving had not signaled us of this breach," said Joaquin Almunia, the head of the antitrust agency, when asked how the oversight went undetected for over a year.
Those reports, it turned out, were coming from Microsoft. "We trusted in the reports on the compliance [from Microsoft]," said Almunia. "We were not trying to explore Windows Service Pack 1. But maybe we should have tried to complement their reports."
He admitted the Commission may have made a mistake letting Microsoft police itself, rather than appointing an external overseer. "In 2009, we were even more naive than today," Almunia added. He also suggested that the agency would change how it monitors deals struck in the future.
The 2009 agreement required Microsoft to show European Windows users a browser ballot, a screen that displayed download links to rivals' browsers, including Google's Chrome, Mozilla's Firefox and Opera Software's Opera.
But Microsoft made what it has repeatedly called a "technical error" when it omitted the ballot from Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1) for 14 months, from May 2011 until July 2012. Approximately 15.3 million users did not see the ballot as intended, said Almunia.
One U.S. antitrust expert struggled to understand why EU regulators let Microsoft supervise itself.
"The Federal Trade Commission, where I used to work, has an entire compliance department, with lawyers and economists, to make sure orders are complied with," said Robert Lande, a law professor at the University of Baltimore and director of the American Antitrust Institute. "That's kind of elementary. It's not rocket science."
Lande also blasted the Commission for allowing a repeat offender to police itself. "Why would you put a three-time offender on the honor system?" Lande asked, referring to other antitrust actions against Microsoft, both in the U.S. and in the EU, that have resulted in billions in fines.
Today, Microsoft reiterated what it has said since mid-2012. "We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologized for it," the company said in a statement. "We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps to strengthen our software development and other processes to help avoid this mistake -- or anything similar -- in the future."
Microsoft's quick admission of the omission, multiple apologies, and cooperation with the EU authorities, were factors Almunia took into consideration when deciding on a fine, he said today.
According to Microsoft, the browser ballot was left out of Windows 7 SP1 when an engineering team forgot to update code that distributed the choice screen.
Microsoft did not report the oversight to the Commission: As late as December 2011, months after the ballot stopped being shown, Microsoft reported that everything was fine. Instead, an unnamed complainant alerted the EU. Almunia has declined to identify the complaint's origin, but one possible suspect is Mozilla, which has been the most vocal of all of Microsoft's browser rivals about its practices.
Lande thought the explanation incredulous. "You can't say it's accidental for 15 months," he argued today. "Microsoft says it was a technical glitch, okay, one month, I understand, you left it out of a batch. But not for 15 months. That doesn't look like an accident to me."
It's unlikely that Microsoft will appeal the fine, what with its public apologies and admission of guilt. Today, however, the company declined to comment on its plans.
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Read more about Gov't Legislation/Regulation in Computerworld's Gov't Legislation/Regulation Topic Center.
- 5 Ways Dropbox for Business Keeps Your Data Protected Protecting your data isn't a feature on a checklist, something to be tacked on as an afterthought. Download here to find out how...
- What is this "File Sync" Thing and Why Should I Care About It? All of a sudden, getting a file from your work laptop to your iPad became as simple as clicking "Save." So it's no...
- The Keys to Securing Data in a Collaborative Workplace Losing data is costly. IT professionals have spent years learning how to protect their organizations from hackers, but how do you ward off...
- Evaluating File Sync and Share Solutions: 12 Questions to Ask about Security File sync and share can increase productivity, but how do you pick a solution that works for you? Download to learn some important...
- Charting Your Analytical Future - "Making predictive analytics part of your business processes" Webinar This session will show how predictive analytics can be used throughout the organization by anyone looking for answers and how organizations can make...
- On-demand webinar - 7 Keys to Service Catalog Implementation Success Watch this webinar to learn 7 crucial keys to make your service catalog a success! All Gov't Legislation/Regulation White Papers | Webcasts