BitDefender traces MiniDuke espionage malware back to June 2011
Info-stealing hackers operated under the radar for more than a year and a half
Computerworld - Romanian security company BitDefender today said it has traced the cyber-espionage malware "MiniDuke" back to June 2011, more than a year and a half before the campaign was uncovered.
BitDefender found the malware by digging through its detection logs, first finding a sample compiled and used by attackers in May 2012. Additional sweeps then identified an even earlier example of the malware dated June 2011.
The new findings significantly push back the start of the MiniDuke espionage campaign, and show that the group responsible spied for months before being revealed.
MiniDuke was publicized and analyzed last week by researchers from Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab and the Laboratory of Cryptography and System Security (CrySyS) at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. The malware used rigged PDF documents to exploit a then-unpatched critical vulnerability in Adobe Reader.
Adobe fixed the flaw with an "out-of-band," or emergency, update issued Feb. 20.
The June 2011 version of MiniDuke was written by the same group that created the more recent samples analyzed by Kaspersky and CrySyS, said Stoica Matei Razvan, a communications specialist with BitDefender Labs, in an interview today.
"Much of the code is the same," said Razvan of BitDefender's comparisons of the June 2011, May 2012 and February 2013 versions. "It's the same group."
Like the most recent run, the May 2012 MiniDuke was implanted on victims' machines using malicious PDFs posing as invitations to a conference. "The organization is real and the contacts listed in the PDF are real," said Razvan. "The PDF looks just right, but it's a fake."
The May 2012 campaign also exploited a then-unpatched flaw in Adobe Reader, Razvan confirmed. Adobe patched Reader three times in 2012: in January, April and August.
The security firm also found hints in the May 2012 copy of MiniDuke of Chinese involvement: It pinged the time-server.org website for the current time and date in China.
Even so, Razvan declined to attribute MiniDuke to Chinese hackers, saying that the time and date request could be a red herring planted by the malware's makers.
When MiniDuke was first revealed, security experts argued over its origin, with some pointing to China while others blamed hackers in Eastern Europe, perhaps from Russia or countries that had once been part of the Soviet Union.
Romania's secret service has claimed that MiniDuke was state sponsored, but has not identified the nation it believes was behind the attacks that were aimed at NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), a slew of organizations in Europe, and in the U.S., several prominent research institutes and think tanks.
Like Kaspersky researchers last week, Razvan today characterized MiniDuke as less ambitious than Stuxnet or Flame, but still sophisticated. "Compared to Stuxnet or Flame, which were really big software projects backed by lots of money, MiniDuke was probably created by a smaller team," said Razvan. "Its code is not as modular, not as complex."
Razvan also said that a Twitter account used to provide command-and-control instructions to MiniDuke was still active, although its latest message was posted Feb. 21. That account was previously used to backtrack possible MiniDuke activity to April 2012.
BitDefender has released a MiniDuke removal tool, which can be downloaded free of charge from its website.
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His email address is email@example.com.
Read more about Malware and Vulnerabilities in Computerworld's Malware and Vulnerabilities Topic Center.
- Best iPhone, iPad Business Apps for 2014
- 14 Tech Conventions You Should Attend in 2014
- 10 Desktop Apps to Power Your Windows PC
- How to Add New Job Skills Without Going Back to School
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
- The Threat Landscape Hardly a day goes by without the discovery of a new cyberthreat somewhere in the world! But how do you keep up with...
- Security for Virtualization In the rush to implement virtualization, security has become second. So while the business benefits are clear, the risks are less well documented...
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - The Original Cloud Operating System
Linux adoption is growing against a number of measures, such as the
number of supercomputers that run Linux and the size of the contributing...
- OpenStack Hype vs. Reality: CIO Quick Pulse Open-source architecture can enable IT departments to build infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) clouds running on standard hardware.
- Webinar: Building a Big Data solution that's production-ready Big data solutions are no longer just a nice-to-have.
- Meg Whitman presents Unlocking IT with Big Data During this Web Event you will hear Meg Whitman, President and CEO, HP discuss HAVEn - the #1 Big Data platform, as well... All Malware and Vulnerabilities White Papers | Webcasts