U.S. ITC to review decision in Apple complaint against Samsung
A Commission judge had earlier ruled that Samsung infringed four Apple patents
IDG News Service - The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided to review an earlier decision that found Samsung Electronics' products infringed four patents owned by Apple.
The four patents relate to the ornamental design of a device, commands through finger contacts on touchscreen displays, a method and apparatus for producing translucent images on a device, and audio I/O headset plug and plug circuitry.
The commission, which has the authority to ban products from sale in the U.S., said on Wednesday that it had decided to review a decision in October by the administrative law judge (ALJ) , which found that Samsung had infringed four Apple patents in its products, while also ruling that Apple's complaint with regard to two other patents was disallowed.
The ITC on Wednesday also decided to remand the investigation to the ALJ with regard to two patents.
In a recommendation in November, ALJ Thomas B. Pender said that the commission if it finds a violation should issue a limited exclusion order directed at Samsung's products found to infringe U.S. Patent numbers D618,678, 7,479,949, RE41,922, and 7,912,501. A limited exclusion order instructs the U.S. Customs Service to exclude from entry all articles covered by the patents at issue, and that originate from a named respondent in the investigation, in this case Samsung.
Pender also recommended that Samsung should be required to post a bond of the entered value for mobile phones, media players and tablet computers that infringe the patents during the period when the U.S. President reviews the exclusion order.
In a filing in December to the ITC, Google said that "Apple asserts patents that cover only small aspects of the feature-packed Android platform and that do not drive consumer demand. These interests do not justify an exclusion order." The commission should allow a grace period of at least six months to allow Samsung to redesign its products to avoid any infringement found, it said.
The case before the ITC is one of several patent infringement disputes between Apple and Samsung, which aim to block sales of each other's smartphones and tablets in various markets.
In another dispute between Apple and Samsung before the ITC, the commission decided to review an earlier decision that Apple did not infringe four patents of Samsung in its mobile devices including the iPhone and iPad. The patents asserted in the dispute are U.S. Patent Nos.7,706,348, 7,486,644, 7,450,114, and 6,771,980 and can be looked up on the website of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
A jury in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, decided in August that Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing several of its patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets. Samsung and Apple have another patent dispute before the same court.
John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is john_ribeiro@idg.com
- Google I/O 2013's Coolest Products and Services
- 10 Star Trek Technologies That are Almost Here
- 19 Generations of Computer Programmers
- 25 Must-Have Technologies for SMBs
- A walking tour: 33 questions to ask about your company's security
- 15 social media scams
- The 7 elements of a successful security awareness program
- IT Certification Study Tips
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Study Tip guide and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, cheat sheets, product reviews and more.
- Case Study: Hospital Turns to Email Archiving Solution to Ensure Regulatory Compliances Read this case study to learn how a cloud-based email archiving solution enabled the hospital to meet government mandates and helps avoid thousands...
- Case Study: In-the-Cloud Email Service Replaces Three Point Products Read this case study for more information on a comprehensive in-the-cloud email service to help replace three point products.
- Case Study: Simplifying the Transition to Exchange 2010 with Email Management Solutions Read this case study to learn how a cloud-based email management solution greatly simplified the company's transition to Exchange 2010.
- What does it take to deliver Security, Privacy and Trust at Mimecast? This whitepaper explains the process and controls that Mimecast put in place to deliver a secure, private and trusted SaaS platform for your...
- Live Webcast
Storage Validation at Go Daddy: Best Practices from the World's #1 Web Hosting Provider - Storage Validation at Go Daddy: Best Practices from the World's #1 Web Hosting Provider
- Live Webcast
On-Demand Webcast: 7 Reasons to Choose VoIP - Thinking about a new phone system for your business?
Be sure to watch this informative webcast. Steve Strauss, small business columnist for USA... - Live Webcast
Unified Communications 101 - Learn more!
- 3 Reasons Why Sepaton is the World's Fastest Backup Solution Leading analyst, Storage Switzerland learns how Sepaton backs up and deduplicates massive data volumes while maintaining the industry's fastest performance - all in...
- Enterprise File Sharing: All You Need to Know Security. Scalability. Control. These are just some of the many benefits of enterprise cloud file-sharing that you'll discover in this KnowledgeVault, packed with... All Android White Papers | Webcasts
By JR Raphael
Google announced tons of stuff at this year's I/O keynote -- but the most anticipated news of the event was nowhere to be found. more