Group challenges Microsoft's patent for FAT file system
The Public Patent Foundation claims that Microsoft's patent should never have been issued since it duplicates earlier patents.
Computerworld - A tiny New York-based nonprofit patent watchdog group is taking on Microsoft Corp. by claiming that a 7-year-old patent Microsoft holds for the FAT file system is invalid and should be revoked.
In a formal request sent yesterday to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in Washington, Daniel Ravicher, executive director of the Public Patent Foundation, asked the patent office to conduct a review because previous patents had already been issued on the same technology.
Ravicher, a patent and trademark attorney who also specializes in open-source legal issues, said he filed the complaint because Microsoft began a campaign late last year to license some of its patents, including the patent for the company's File Allocation Table (FAT) file system (see story). Ravicher alleges that Microsoft wants to control the licensing of the FAT system so it can discourage open-source and free software by not allowing it to be interchangeable with Microsoft software.
The issue Ravicher presented to the Patent Office, however, simply argues that U.S. Patent No. 5,579,517 should never have been issued to Microsoft in November 1996 because "prior art," or evidence that someone else had previously applied for and received a patent for the idea, exists. In his letter to the patent office, Ravicher pointed out the missed prior art and asked for a review of the case.
"There's presumed to be harm on everyone if a patent is issued where it shouldn't be issued," Ravicher said. "The 517 patent is causing immeasurable injury to the public by serving as a tool to enlarge Microsoft's monopoly while also preventing competition."
Microsoft applied for the patent on April 1, 1993, according to patent records. The FAT system was originally created in the mid-1970s, according to Ravicher's letter.
Microsoft spokesman Mark Martin said the company hadn't yet received a copy of the group's letter to the patent office. "We're unfamiliar with this organization and unclear why they are so interested in this one patent," he said in a statement. "Companies asked Microsoft to license our FAT specification and patents to help improve interoperability, and we have entered into a number of such licenses."
The FAT is an organizational system used to keep track of where data is stored on a storage disk so the data can be found and used by the machine. It is used in computers and other digital devices, including digital cameras and detachable storage media.
The affected patent will continue to be held by Microsoft until 2013, when it will expire under U.S. patent law.
In its letter, the foundation said that "Microsoft is usingits control over the interchange of digital media to aid its ongoing effort to deter competition."
"We'd like to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt and believe that they are not adopting a strategy of foreclosing competition through the use of dubious patents," Ravicher said. "Unfortunately, their past anticompetitive behavior combined with their recent launch of a comprehensive patent assertion campaign causes us to have serious concerns about their intentions."
"In the end, our beef is not with Microsoft per se," Ravicher said. "It's with our broken patent system that is completely failing to ensure only deserving patents get issued."
A spokesman for the patent office couldn't be reached before deadline.
Read more about Gov't Legislation/Regulation in Computerworld's Gov't Legislation/Regulation Topic Center.
- Google I/O 2013's Coolest Products and Services
- 10 Star Trek Technologies That are Almost Here
- 19 Generations of Computer Programmers
- 25 Must-Have Technologies for SMBs
- A walking tour: 33 questions to ask about your company's security
- 15 social media scams
- The 7 elements of a successful security awareness program
- IT Certification Study Tips
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Study Tip guide and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, cheat sheets, product reviews and more.
- Case Study: Hospital Turns to Email Archiving Solution to Ensure Regulatory Compliances Read this case study to learn how a cloud-based email archiving solution enabled the hospital to meet government mandates and helps avoid thousands...
- Case Study: In-the-Cloud Email Service Replaces Three Point Products Read this case study for more information on a comprehensive in-the-cloud email service to help replace three point products.
- Case Study: Simplifying the Transition to Exchange 2010 with Email Management Solutions Read this case study to learn how a cloud-based email management solution greatly simplified the company's transition to Exchange 2010.
- What does it take to deliver Security, Privacy and Trust at Mimecast? This whitepaper explains the process and controls that Mimecast put in place to deliver a secure, private and trusted SaaS platform for your...
- 3 Reasons Why Sepaton is the World's Fastest Backup Solution Leading analyst, Storage Switzerland learns how Sepaton backs up and deduplicates massive data volumes while maintaining the industry's fastest performance - all in...
- Enterprise File Sharing: All You Need to Know Security. Scalability. Control. These are just some of the many benefits of enterprise cloud file-sharing that you'll discover in this KnowledgeVault, packed with... All Gov't Legislation/Regulation White Papers | Webcasts