Court's damages expert for Oracle-Google trial stands to get $2 million
The compensation, revealed in court filings, seems 'enormous,' according to one observer
IDG News Service - A court-appointed damages expert who served in the intellectual-property suit Oracle lodged against Google over the Android mobile OS could receive nearly $2 million in compensation, according to court filings late Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Earlier this year, Google largely prevailed in the case, which centered on whether Android infringed on copyright and patents Oracle holds on the Java programming language. Google demanded in its Thursday filing that Oracle pay Google's share of Dr. James Kearl's fees and expenses, which amounted to $986,978.
Oracle "recovered none of the relief it sought in this litigation," Google said. "Accordingly, Google is the prevailing party and is entitled to recover costs."
Before the trial, Judge William Alsup ordered the appointment of Kearl as an independent expert and said Oracle and Google would have to split the cost of his fees. Given that Google wants Oracle to pay nearly $1 million, the total amount to be given Kearl could be close to $2 million.
"That's an enormous number," said an attorney familiar with but not directly connected to the case, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "If you just do the numbers, that would be 2,000 hours at $1,000 per hour."
It was not immediately clear how the expenses attributed to Kearl's services break down, as invoices associated with them were filed under seal with the court.
Some of the total can likely be attributed to travel and accommodations fees, as well as monies paid to any supporting staff Kearl may have had, the attorney said. A more reasonable sum for Kearl's services might be $500,000, which would still be sizable but realistic given the complexity of the case, the attorney added.
Oracle and Google also hired their own damages experts to submit reports; the total of their fees wasn't available Friday.
Kearl and an attorney previously appointed by the court to represent him in his duties as a witness did not respond to requests for comment.
Google is also seeking about $3 million from Oracle in "fees for exemplification and the costs of making copies of any materials where the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case," according to the filing.
Documents were collected from 86 parties for the suit, and Google shipped nearly 100 million documents to a vendor for processing and review, it adds. That set of documents was narrowed down, with Google ultimately providing some 3.3 million documents "in response to Oracle's requests," the filing states.
Google also wants Oracle to pay roughly $140,000 for transcripts associated with the case.
An Oracle spokeswoman declined comment.
The legal battle between Oracle and Google may be far from concluded, as Oracle is expected to appeal.
Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com
- Best iPhone, iPad Business Apps for 2014
- 14 Tech Conventions You Should Attend in 2014
- 10 Desktop Apps to Power Your Windows PC
- How to Add New Job Skills Without Going Back to School
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
- Review: Box beats Dropbox - and all the rest - for business Box trumps Dropbox, Engyte, Citrix ShareFile, EMC Syncplicity, and OwnCloud with rich mix of file sync, file sharing, user management, deep reporting and...
- Analyst Report-Mixed All Flash Arrays Delivers Safer Higher Performance What is the impact of an all-flash array with enterprise features and reliability on the mainstream data center? In the mainstream environment, storage...
- Embracing Flash Storage Exec Brief Flash storage can deliver impressive performance, especially for random I/O, by eliminating rotational and seek latencies that are common in all hard disk...
- Embracing Tiered Storage Exec Brief All data is not created equal and thus all data need not be treated the same by the storage system. IT executives must...
- Four Myths of High-Productivity App Dev Debunked Debunk the main myths surrounding high-productivity application development and how both platforms have overcome them.
On-Demand Webcast: 7 Reasons to Choose VoIP
Thinking about a new phone system for your business?
Be sure to watch this informative webcast. Steve Strauss, small business columnist for USA...
All Legal White Papers |