U.S. judge cancels Motorola, Apple patent trial
The Judge has tentatively decided to dimiss the case wthout prejudice
IDG News Service - A U.S. Judge canceled a trial scheduled to start Monday in a patent dispute between Apple and Motorola Mobility, and said he had tentatively decided that the case should be dismissed as neither side had established a right to relief.
Richard A. Posner, a Circuit Judge, is presiding over Apple's patent lawsuit against Motorola and Motorola Mobility in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, a trial court. "I have tentatively decided that the case should be dismissed with prejudice because neither party can establish a right to relief," he said in an order on Thursday.
Google closed last month the US$12.5 billion acquisition of Motorola Mobility, after receiving regulatory approvals from many countries including China.
Judge Posner said in his order that he would delay entry of judgment until he had prepared a full opinion in about a week, as he may change his mind in the course of the preparation. In the event the Judge limited himself to briefly sketch the grounds for his tentative view.
In previous rulings, Judge Posner has trimmed the number of patents in dispute. Apple concedes that in the light of his May 22 order, it cannot prove damages for the alleged infringement of two patents, the '002 and '949, the Judge said in his two-page order.
That leaves Apple with just its claims for infringement of two patents, the '263 and '647 patents, the Judge said. "I tentatively conclude that its admissible evidence of damages with respect to those claims do not create a genuine issue of material fact enabling it to withstand Motorola's motion for summary judgment," he added.
The Judge also said he had tentatively concluded that the admissible evidence of damages with respect to Apple's alleged infringement of Motorola's '898 patent also "fails to create a genuine issue of material fact."
He said that he could not find basis for injunctive relief as well, as it would impose costs disproportionate to the harm inflicted on the patent holders or benefit to alleged infringer, and would be contrary to the public interest. The Judge also tentatively denied Apple's right to declaratory relief as an alternative to injunctive relief.
Apple filed a suit against Motorola, alleging that its devices such as the Droid, and associated software infringed on its patents. Motorola brought a counterclaim that Apple was in infringement of its patents.
Apple, Motorola, and Google were not immediately available for comment. Apple and Motorola are sparring in other courts as well on patent issues, including in Germany.
- Big Data, Big Mess: Sound Risk Intelligence Through Complete Context This paper examines the insecurity of the small businesses in the supply chain and offers tips to close those backdoors into the enterprise.
- Using Cyber Insurance and Cybercrime Data to Limit Your Business Risk This paper examines the challenges of understanding cyber risks, the importance of having the right cyber risk intelligence, and how to use this...
- 5 Tips to Secure Small Business Backdoors in the Enterprise Supply Chain This paper examines the insecurity of the small businesses in the supply chain and offers tips to close those backdoors into the enterprise.
- Confront consumerization with convergence Virtualization expert Elias Khnaser spotlights the security, compliance, and governance issues that arise when enterprise users "consumerize" with shadow IT and public cloud...
- NSS Labs & Cisco Present: Evaluating Leading Breach Detection Systems Today's constantly evolving advanced malware and APTs can evade point-in-time defenses to penetrate networks. Security professionals must evolve their strategy in lockstep to...
- Will the Real Endpoint Threat Detection and Response Please Stand Up? This webinar explores new technologies & process for protecting endpoints from advanced attackers as well as the innovations that are pushing the envelope... All Legal White Papers | Webcasts