Researchers reveal how Flame fakes Windows Update
Bogus certificates key, but espionage malware also spoofs Microsoft's update service on a network
Computerworld - Security researchers today published detailed information about how the Flame cyber-espionage malware spreads through a network by exploiting Microsoft's Windows Update mechanism.
Their examinations answered a question that had puzzled researchers at Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab: How was Flame infecting fully-patched Windows 7 machines?
Key to the phony Windows Update process was that the hackers had located and exploited a flaw in the company's Terminal Services licensing certificate authority (CA) that allowed them to generate code-validating certificates "signed" by Microsoft.
Armed with those fake certificates, the attackers could fool a Windows PC into accepting a file as an update from Microsoft when in reality it was nothing of the kind.
"Hijacking Windows Update is not trivial because updates must be signed by Microsoft," noted Symantec on Monday in one of a series of blog posts its researchers have written about Flame.
One of the certificates was valid between February 2010 and February 2012, and used to sign the malicious file in late December 2010, adding more information to experts building a timeline of Flame's development and attacks.
Other security experts were even more impressed with what Flame managed. Earlier Monday, Mikko Hypponen, F-Secure's chief research officer and the first to announce that Flame was abusing Windows Update, called the feat "the Holy Grail of malware writers" and "the nightmare scenario" for antivirus researchers.
But as both Symantec and Kaspersky pointed out, Flame doesn't actually compromise Windows Update. It doesn't somehow infiltrate Microsoft's service -- and servers -- to force-feed malicious files to unsuspecting users.
Instead, a Flame-infected Windows PC can, in some situations, make other machines on a network believe it's Windows Update.
A PC compromised by Flame can sniff a networks' NetBIOS information, which identifies each computer, then use that to intercept Windows Updates requests by Internet Explorer (IE). Flame claims to be the WPAD (Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Protocol) server -- a system that provides proxy settings to copies of IE on the network -- and sends a malicious WPAD configuration file to the requesting PC.
As Symantec noted, WPAD hijacking is not new and is, in fact, part of many hacker toolkits.
The rogue WPAD configuration file modifies the victimized machine's proxy settings so that all Web traffic is routed through the Flame-infected system. On that PC, Flame's Web server, dubbed "Munch" kicks in, detects when the requested URL matches Windows Update's and in return sends a downloader disguised as a legitimate update from Microsoft.
To complete the ruse, the downloader was one of several compressed files -- crunched into the "cabinet," or ".cab" file format -- bundled into the single Windows Update.
Once the downloader was installed it retrieved a copy of Flame from the already-infected PC and uses it to compromise the computer.
This complex spreading technique only added to researchers' grudging respect for the threat.
"As we continue our investigation ... more and more details appear [that show] this is one of the most interesting and complex malicious programs we have ever seen," said Alexander Gostev, who leads Kaspersky's research and analysis team, in a Monday blog entry.
Microsoft has revoked three certificates generated by the attackers, making further spoofing of Windows Update files impossible on patched PCs unless there are more rogue certificates in the wild. The company has also blocked others from cranking out new code-signing certificates.
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His email address is email@example.com.
- DOJ's charges against China reframe security, surveillance debate
- Hacker indictments against China's military unlikely to change anything
- U.S. to formally accuse Chinese military of hacking
- Cyberattacks could paralyze U.S., former defense chief warns
- The NSA blame game: Singling out RSA diverts attention from others
- Jury still out on FISA court
- Suspected China-based hackers 'Comment Crew' rises again
- Chinese hackers master the art of lying in wait
- Spy court OK'd all U.S. wiretap requests it received in 2012
- Groups denounce FBI plan to require Internet backdoors for wiretaps
Read more about Malware and Vulnerabilities in Computerworld's Malware and Vulnerabilities Topic Center.
- Deep Security +VMware vSphere with Operations Management Most midsize organizations are highly virtualized on VMware, and while this has produced significant savings, it also has created new challenges when it...
- 3 Questions to Ask Your DNS Host about Lowering DDoS Risks Neustar has had wide-ranging conversations with clients wanting to know how they can optimize protection as DDoS attacks increase in frequency and size.
- The Danger Deepens: 2014 Neustar Annual DDoS Attacks and Impact Report This report compares DDoS findings from 2013 to 2012, based on a survey of 440 North American companies, including 139 businesses delivering technology...
- DDoS Infographic: How Are Attacks Evolving? For the third consecutive year, Neustar surveyed businesses across major industries to track the evolution of DDoS attacks. Are they more frequent? Larger?...
- How to Use Crowd-Sourced Threat Intelligence to Stop Malware in its Tracks Threat sharing networks have been around for a long time, however they have typically been "invitation-only", available to only large companies, or those...
- An Incident Response Playbook: From Monitoring to Operations As cyber-attacks grow more sophisticated, many organizations are investing more into incident detection and response capabilities. In this webcast, learn how to develop... All Malware and Vulnerabilities White Papers | Webcasts