Judge again orders Apple, Samsung to streamline claims in iPad patent case
The companies' lawyers have until Monday to simplify the case enough for a scheduled July 30 trial
IDG News Service - Apple and Samsung Electronics have until Monday to further boil down the number of claims to be considered in the sweeping intellectual-property lawsuit concerning their smartphone and tablet products, which is now scheduled to go to trial July 30.
Judge Lucy Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ordered the companies to pare down the case, in which Apple and Samsung are suing each other over patent infringement and other claims, so a jury can understand and fairly judge the issues in one trial. It was the second time the judge had asked them to downsize their claims. The order came at a case management conference at the court on Wednesday afternoon.
In a joint statement filed Tuesday in preparation for Wednesday's conference, Apple and Samsung each had offered to drop some patents and claims from the case but said lack of cooperation from the other side prevented greater streamlining. But that left 16 patents, six trademarks, five "trade dress" claims, and an antitrust case, with 37 products accused of violations. The companies each will have 25 hours to present their cases to a jury.
"I think that's cruel and unusual punishment to a jury, so I'm not willing to do it," Judge Koh said. "If you're going to trial in July, this is not going to be acceptable." If the companies don't present a more workable set of claims, the trial date could be pushed back to 2013, she suggested.
Apple said it was the only party with an interest in bringing the case to trial on time, and attorney Harold McElhinny of Morrison & Foerster, representing Apple, did most of the pleading for another chance to pare the case down. He asked for guidance on how much the companies could bring to trial, but Koh would not spell it out.
"We will do whatever we need to do to hold the trial date," McElhinny said.
Apple sued Samsung in April 2011, claiming the South Korean electronics giant had violated a long list of Apple patents and trademarks in its Android smartphones and tablets. Samsung then sued Apple on patent claims of its own. In February, Apple sued Samsung again on similar grounds, citing products Samsung had introduced after the 2011 complaint was filed. The companies are now embroiled in an array of disputes in courts in several countries.
Also in the joint statement filed Tuesday, each side asked the court not to allow some opposing witnesses and made a variety of other requests for ground rules of the trial. Among other things, Apple asked that the Samsung logo on in-court video screens be obscured during the trial. Apple also wanted the court to exclude any arguments or evidence based on statements attributed to Apple co-founder Steve Jobs in the popular biography written by Walter Isaacson, as well as any references to working conditions in China or to the size of Apple's tax bills.
- Google I/O 2013's Coolest Products and Services
- 10 Star Trek Technologies That are Almost Here
- 19 Generations of Computer Programmers
- 25 Must-Have Technologies for SMBs
- A walking tour: 33 questions to ask about your company's security
- 15 social media scams
- The 7 elements of a successful security awareness program
- IT Certification Study Tips
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Study Tip guide and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, cheat sheets, product reviews and more.
- ESG: The Contemporary Value of Virtual Storage Appliances: HP renews its focus with StoreVirtual VSA A good virtual storage appliance (VSA) can simultaneously make good business sense and deliver operational value by allowing users to avoid the additional...
- Taneja Group: HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 - Enterprise for the Mid-range In this report, the Taneja Group takes an objective, in-depth look at the features of the HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 powered by Intel...
- Edison Group: Stepping Up to the Next Generation: The Business Value of Upgrading from HP EVA Storage to 3PAR StoreServ Storage HP EVA Storage users who face performance and scalability tradeoffs should consider an upgrade to 3PAR StoreServ Storage, powered by Intel Xeon processors.
- Taneja Group: Ensuring Business Continuity of SAN Storage with the HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 Family Built from the ground up with business continuity in mind, Taneja reviews the HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 array, powered by Intel Xeon processors,...
- Live Webcast
Get an Integrated Approach to Data Management - This KnowledgeVault Exchange is your one-stop resource center for designing a winning data management strategy with quantifiable top-line gains and bottom-line savings.
- 3 Reasons Why Sepaton is the World's Fastest Backup Solution Leading analyst, Storage Switzerland learns how Sepaton backs up and deduplicates massive data volumes while maintaining the industry's fastest performance - all in...
- Enterprise File Sharing: All You Need to Know Security. Scalability. Control. These are just some of the many benefits of enterprise cloud file-sharing that you'll discover in this KnowledgeVault, packed with... All Data Center White Papers | Webcasts