Skip the navigation

Verizon spectrum deals could hurt competition, say critics

Critics say Verizon's proposed purchase of spectrum from cable companies could lead to higher prices, less choice

By Grant Gross
March 21, 2012 04:49 PM ET

IDG News Service - Verizon Wireless' proposed purchase of unused mobile spectrum from four cable companies will reduce the incentive for the companies to compete against each other in the video and broadband markets, critics told U.S. lawmakers Wednesday.

The spectrum deals, announced in December, include agreements that would allow Verizon and the four cable companies to market each others' products, leaving the companies with less incentive to compete against each other on price and services, said Joel Kelsey, policy adviser at Free Press, a digital rights group.

"These agreements simply represent a deal between these companies to stay out of each others' way in perpetuity," he said. "They put former rivals on the path to cooperation, not competition."

The deals, which would allow Verizon to purchase mobile licenses covering more than 280 million U.S. residents, would also kill potential competition in a mobile industry increasingly dominated by Verizon and AT&T, Kelsey said. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission needs to kill the deal to preserve mobile competition, he told the antitrust subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.

The two deals, for about US$3.9 billion, would allow Verizon to buy 20MHz of spectrum from SpectrumCo, a joint venture among Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks, and from Cox Communications. The deals will help Verizon offset a predicted spectrum crunch, aid Randal Milch, executive vice president and general counsel at Verizon Communications.

It's "critical" that the cable spectrum be used for mobile services, with smartphone traffic predicted to be more than 25 times higher in 2015 than it is today, Milch said.

Several senators questioned whether the spectrum and joint marketing deals will be good for U.S. consumers. The deal could lead to higher cable TV rates, with less incentive for Verizon Wireless' parent company, Verizon Communications, to aggressively market its Fios video service against Comcast and other cable firms, said Senator Al Franken, a Minnesota Democrat.

"This is really at the heart of why I am skeptical about this deal," Franken said. "It's almost as if your companies got in a room together, and you agreed to throw in the towel and stop competing against each other."

Representatives of Verizon and Comcast said their companies will continue to compete against each other in video and broadband services. The Fios video service is "a superior product that customers like and we are going to push it as hard as we can," Milch said.

After Verizon has spent $23 billion to build its Fios broadband and video network, it doesn't make sense for the company to stop competing, Milch said.

Comcast talked to most mobile carriers before deciding to sell the spectrum to Verizon, said David Cohen, Comcast's executive vice president. The Verizon proposal represented the best deal for Comcast and consumers, he said.

Reprinted with permission from IDG.net. Story copyright 2014 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Our Commenting Policies
Consumerization of IT: Be in the know
consumer tech

Our new weekly Consumerization of IT newsletter covers a wide range of trends including BYOD, smartphones, tablets, MDM, cloud, social and what it all means for IT. Subscribe now and stay up to date!