Pwn2Own, Pwnium pay researchers $210K for browser bugs
Last day of hacking events shake loose bugs in Firefox, Chrome
Computerworld - Researchers last Friday unveiled zero-day vulnerabilities in Google's Chrome and Mozilla's Firefox during the final day of two hacking challenges that awarded $210,000 to contestants.
The Chrome vulnerabilities were submitted by a teenage researcher identified as "PinkiePie," who was only the second to participate in the Google-sponsored "Pwnium" event.
After verifying that PinkiePie's work met Pwnium's requirement for a "full Chrome exploit" -- meaning that the two bugs were in the browser's own code and included a "sandbox escape" exploit -- Google awarded him $60,000.
It was the second such payout during the three-day event. On Wednesday, Google paid $60,000 to Sergey Glazunov, a frequent recipient of bounties paid by Google throughout the year.
In announcing PinkiePie's win, Jason Kersey, a Chrome program manager, called the researchers' exploits "works of art." Kersey also promised that Google would publish technical write-ups of the two Pwnium submissions.
On Saturday, Google patched Chrome to fix PinkiePie's vulnerabilities, the second time in three days that it updated the browser within 24 hours of obtaining bugs.
Also on Friday, HP TippingPoint's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) closed out its "Pwn2Own" hacking contest, which like Pwnium ran March 7-9 at the CanSecWest security conference in Vancouver, British Columbia.
On the last day of Pwn2Own, a two-man team -- Vincenzo Iozzo and Willem Pinckaers -- exploited a Firefox zero-day to take the contest's $30,000 second-place prize.
Iozzo and Pinckaers, who also cranked out four other exploits of previously-patched vulnerabilities during Pwn2Own's on-site component, are no strangers to the contest. Last year, they made up two-thirds of a team that won $15,000 by hacking a BlackBerry smartphone.
A team from French security company Vupen won Pwn2Own's first-place prize of $60,000 by hacking Chrome and Microsoft's Internet Explorer earlier in the week.
ZDI did not award Pwn2Own's third-place prize of $15,000 because only two teams participated in the contest.
All told, the two events paid out $210,000 in prize money, a record at CanSecWest.
The dueling challenges were not on the original agenda for CanSecWest: A week before the conference opened, Google withdrew its Pwn2Own sponsorship over objections to that contest's practice of not requiring researchers to divulge "sandbox-escape" exploits.
Google then announced its own Pwnium, and pledged to pay up to $1 million for hacks that exploited Chrome zero-day vulnerabilities.
The code execution vulnerabilities used by the Vupen and Iozzo-Pinckaers teams during Pwn2Own will be reported to vendors today, ZDI said on Twitter last Friday.
The only browser not targeted at Pwn2Own was Apple's Safari, which went untouched for the first time in the contest's six-year history.
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at
@gkeizer, or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed
. His e-mail address is gkeizer@ix.netcom.com.
Read more about Security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.
- Google I/O 2013's Coolest Products and Services
- 10 Star Trek Technologies That are Almost Here
- 19 Generations of Computer Programmers
- 25 Must-Have Technologies for SMBs
- A walking tour: 33 questions to ask about your company's security
- 15 social media scams
- The 7 elements of a successful security awareness program
- IT Certification Study Tips
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Study Tip guide and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, cheat sheets, product reviews and more.
- Case Study: Hospital Turns to Email Archiving Solution to Ensure Regulatory Compliances Read this case study to learn how a cloud-based email archiving solution enabled the hospital to meet government mandates and helps avoid thousands...
- Case Study: In-the-Cloud Email Service Replaces Three Point Products Read this case study for more information on a comprehensive in-the-cloud email service to help replace three point products.
- What does it take to deliver Security, Privacy and Trust at Mimecast? This whitepaper explains the process and controls that Mimecast put in place to deliver a secure, private and trusted SaaS platform for your...
- Your Data under Siege: Defeating the Enemy of Complexity Even if you have adequate antivirus protection, are there still holes in your IT security armor? Is lack of bandwidth to manage the...
- Live Webcast
Storage Validation at Go Daddy: Best Practices from the World's #1 Web Hosting Provider - Storage Validation at Go Daddy: Best Practices from the World's #1 Web Hosting Provider
- Live Webcast
MFT and FileXpress - An Overview - Business users and applications exchange files on a regular basis. File transfer is a core part of the flow of business activity.
- Live Webcast
Bridging HTTP and FTP with FileXpress Internet Server - What if you could take an FTP server on your internal network, and allow external users (partners or customers) to securely access it...
- Bridging HTTP and FTP with FileXpress Internet Server What if you could take an FTP server on your internal network, and allow external users (partners or customers) to securely access it...
- MFT and FileXpress - An Overview Business users and applications exchange files on a regular basis. File transfer is a core part of the flow of business activity. All Security White Papers | Webcasts