U.S. lawmakers want FTC to probe Google over Safari cookies
The lawmakers are concerned that Google may have violated a consent agreement it reached with the FTC last year
IDG News Service - Three lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives have asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether last week's report of privacy violations of Safari users by Google violated a consent agreement the company had reached with the FTC last year.
Google's alleged circumvention of do-not-track controls on Apple's Safari browser could have a wide sweeping impact because Safari is a major web browser used by millions of Americans, according to a letter to the FTC on Friday from Republican Representatives Cliff Stearns of Florida and Joe Barton of Texas, and Democrat Edward Markey of Massachusetts.
"As members of the Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus, we are interested in any actions that FTC has taken or plans to take to investigate whether Google has violated the terms of its consent agreement," the lawmakers said in the letter.
"We are taking steps to address concerns, and we are happy to answer any questions regulators and others may have," Google spokesman Chris Gaither said in an email.
The consent order entered on Oct. 13 among other things bars Google from making misrepresentations regarding its privacy policies, and requires it to implement a comprehensive privacy program, including retaining an independent third-party professional to assess its privacy controls every two years, FTC said.
The alleged Safari circumvention could lead to large fines if the FTC decides that Google violated the consent agreement.
The three senators were one of eight members of the U.S. House of Representatives who asked last month for FTC scrutiny of Google's decision to share user data across its online services, and said they wanted Google to provide users a simple and straightforward opt out from the data collection.
A number of privacy groups asked the FTC last week to investigate the alleged circumvention of Safari controls.
Google said it did not intentionally install tracking cookies. "We used known Safari functionality to provide features that signed-in Google users had enabled," Rachel Whetstone, Google senior vice president for communications and public policy, said in a statement. "It's important to stress that these advertising cookies do not collect personal information."
The FTC said last week it was aware of the allegations against Google, but it is likely to want to set the pace for its investigations, as indicated by a filing in a related lawsuit before a federal court in the District of Columbia filed by Electronic Privacy Information Center,
EPIC had alleged that Google's proposed consolidation of data across its services, that will take effect on March 1, will result in a violation of the consent order. It asked the court to compel the FTC to file a civil action in a U.S court to enforce a consent order.
But the government said in the filing Friday that "no statutory provision circumscribes the Commission's decision whether to initiate enforcement proceedings; thus, such a decision is not subject to judicial review". Forcing the Commission to bring a particular enforcement action within an arbitrary time limit would be wholly inimical to the public interest in the effective enforcement of the laws that Congress has passed to protect the public and entrusted the FTC to enforce, it added.


- Excel 2010 Cheat Sheet
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Cheat Sheet and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, guides, product reviews and more.
- Practice Management: Double Billing Rate and Improve Patient Services
- Would you like to double your billing rate and achieve faster payment for services?
Download this customer success story to see how One Health... - Mission Critical Data Explosion and Customer Case Study
- Would you like to double your tier 1 storage capacity while simultaneously reducing your storage footprint?
Download this customer success story to see how... - Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios
- Read this new eBook to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.
- Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving
- Read the analyst report and learn how you can leverage the core capabilities of a DAP solution for better database security.
- Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional
- The options for securing increasingly valuable databases are very broad and deep, and can be confusing. This research provides an overview of three... All DRM and Legal Issues White Papers
- Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring
- View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with...
- InfoSphere Warehouse Packs Demo
- These flash modules make warehousing more tangible and relevant to business users through detailed explanations of the InfoSphere Warehouse Packs.
- Delivery Management -- Extending Lifecycle Management
- Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT
Siloed organizations continue doing the wrong things and doing things wrong, leading to increased costs,... - Leverage automation today to reduce IT complexity
- Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2012, 2:00 PM EDT
Whether your B2B complexity is caused by multiple technologies due to M&A, business or application specific... - Redefine Expectations in the Data Center
- Need to do more with less? Watch this video to learn how HP ProLiant Gen8 servers can help your business deploy servers three... All DRM and Legal Issues Webcasts