Skip the navigation

Auditor: State's HR software system has series of 'material weaknesses'

Issues with the SAP-based Kentucky Human Resources Information System are being addressed, according to officials

By Chris Kanaracus
February 17, 2012 11:25 AM ET

IDG News Service - An SAP-based human resources software system implemented last year by Kentucky's government suffered from a series of "material weaknesses" that could result in significant financial misstatements, according to a report released this week by the state's auditor.


The Kentucky Human Resource Information System went live in April 2011. State Auditor Adam Edelen's report concerns Kentucky's fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

His office found eight material weaknesses related to KHRIS along with another seven "significant deficiencies," which are considered less worrisome "yet important enough to merit attention," it said in a statement.

"The findings in the audit related to KHRIS demonstrate the need for continued scrutiny and oversight by the Personnel Cabinet, which failed to perform necessary testing prior to the system's launch," Edelen said in a statement.

In one case, a worker was erroneously paid more than US$10,000 for work he didn't do, according to the audit report.

"The Department of Corrections (DOC) performs dual entry for personnel actions in both KHRIS and KRONOS [sic], their third-party timekeeping system," it states. "When the employee at DOC was imputing the data into KRONOS, they made a typo and used the employee ID assigned to an individual located in another agency. When the files in KRONOS were uploaded into KHRIS, the incorrect data was not rejected."

KHRIS hadn't been tweaked properly to disallow such a thing from happening, the report adds.

The audit's findings also stated that KHRIS had gone into production despite the fact that project staff "had not developed numerous reports within KHRIS that were comparable to what was previously available within the legacy system," it states. The system was also found to be calculating employee pay rates in an inconsistent manner.

In statements included with the audit, the Personnel Council said the issues raised by Edelen's office were being addressed.

One expert with no first-hand knowledge of the KHRIS issues said there are some reasons SAP human resources projects can have problems, and it's not usually the software.

"Typically they have more to do with the low bid procurement process, inexperienced consultants, and internal customer issues," said Jarret Pazahanick managing partner of the consulting firm EIC Experts, via email. "SAP payroll works for the public sector, as there are a number of success stories in the marketplace."

In addition, human resource software projects are particularly prone to garnering negative attention, according to Pazahanick, who has worked on many large SAP human resource implementations.

"When you are dealing with employee's paychecks there is no room for error, as they will notice if their check changes even the slightest," he said. "In many public sector projects there can be a large population of union employees (and rules) or hourly employees which can complicate things. That said with adequate parallel testing (run payroll in both legacy and SAP during testing phase) all these problems should be easily identified and fixed."

Reprinted with permission from Story copyright 2014 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Our Commenting Policies