Update: Mozilla declines to say if it's renewed $100M Google deal
Contract that expired last month generated $103.5 million for Mozilla last year
Computerworld - Mozilla last week declined to say whether it has renewed its contract with Google, a major revenue stream that keeps its Firefox browser in business.
If it fails to reach a new agreement with Google, Mozilla could see its revenues plunge by 80% or more.
The contract between Mozilla and Google was set to expire in November.
When asked if it had negotiated a new contract with Google, Mozilla declined to answer. Instead, it issued a statement that it has used before.
"We currently have partnerships with a number of search providers that differ by market, including major search partners including Google, Bing, Yahoo, Yandex, Amazon, eBay and others," a Mozilla spokeswoman said in an email. "We have every confidence that search partnerships will remain a solid generator of revenue for Mozilla for the foreseeable future."
That statement was virtually identical to one Mozilla has used in previous years when asked about its relationship with Google, most recently in an October FAQ that accompanied its annual financial report.
In the 2010 report, Mozilla did not disclose the amounts it received from individual search partners, but said that payments from search services accounted for 98% of the year's revenues, or $121.1 million out of a total of $123.2 million.
Mozilla receives revenues from search engines when Firefox users click on ads placed on search results pages.
Firefox, which has long set Google as Firefox's default search engine, has relied on the rival for most of its income. In 2008, the last time Mozilla broke out payments by search partner, it said Google accounted for 88% of its royalty revenues.
Although a note in the 2010 financial report didn't name Google, Mozilla said there that a search contract "which expires in November 2011" had provided 84% of its 2010 income, and 86% of its 2009 revenues.
If the Google contract had not been in place in 2010, Mozilla's revenues would have been just $19.7 million.
Questions about Mozilla's dependence on Google have been raised since the latter launched its own Web browser, Chrome, in September 2008. According to Internet metrics firms StatCounter and Net Applications, Chrome owned a 25.7% or 18.2%, respectively, of the global browser usage share in November, compared to Firefox's 25.2% or 22.1%.
StatCounter's numbers indicated Chrome had already passed Firefox to take second place behind Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE), while Net Applications' hinted at a takeover by Chrome as soon as April or May 2012.
As of Sunday, new installations of Firefox continued to use Google as its default search engine.
Mozilla has, however, taken small steps to wean itself from Google, including a customized edition dubbed "Firefox with Bing," which uses Microsoft's Bing search as the default engine in both the browser's search box and its "Awesome Bar," the dual-use address bar where users can also enter search queries.
In 2007, Mitchell Baker, then Mozilla's CEO -- now the chairwoman of the Mozilla Foundation, the non-profit group that oversees Mozilla Corp., the entity actually responsible for Firefox development -- said that Mozilla could live without Google's money if necessary.
According to its 2010 financial statement, Mozilla had approximately $105 million bankrolled in money market accounts, government and commercial bonds, and other securities.
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His e-mail address is email@example.com.
Read more about Desktop Apps in Computerworld's Desktop Apps Topic Center.
- Best iPhone, iPad Business Apps for 2014
- 14 Tech Conventions You Should Attend in 2014
- 10 Desktop Apps to Power Your Windows PC
- How to Add New Job Skills Without Going Back to School
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - The Original Cloud Operating System
Linux adoption is growing against a number of measures, such as the
number of supercomputers that run Linux and the size of the contributing...
- OpenStack Hype vs. Reality: CIO Quick Pulse Open-source architecture can enable IT departments to build infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) clouds running on standard hardware.
- Building a Bridge to the Next Generation Data Center Selecting a widely adopted operating system is a foundational component of a standardization strategy.
- OpenStack and Red Hat: IDC White paper Most OpenStack deployments are by public cloud providers that are early adopters of technology and use OpenStack in a do-it-yourself deployment and support...
- Webinar: Building a Big Data solution that's production-ready Big data solutions are no longer just a nice-to-have.
- Meg Whitman presents Unlocking IT with Big Data During this Web Event you will hear Meg Whitman, President and CEO, HP discuss HAVEn - the #1 Big Data platform, as well... All Desktop Apps White Papers | Webcasts