Stuxnet struck five targets in Iran, say researchers
Attacks started in June 2009, ended in May 2010, a month before anyone noticed, says Symantec
Computerworld - Researchers at Symantec today said that the notorious Stuxnet worm targeted five separate organizations, and that attacks against those objectives -- all with a presence in Iran -- started in June 2009, more than a year before independent experts raised the alarm.
In a post on Symantec's security blog, the company said that further analysis of Stuxnet samples showed that the worm was aimed at five different organizations. "All targeted organizations have a presence in Iran," said Ben Nahorney, a senior information developer with the U.S.-based security company.
Speculation on Stuxnet's targets has centered on a pair of Iranian locations crucial to its nuclear program: the underground uranium enrichment facility at Natanz in the central part of the country, and the nuclear reactor at Bushehr, in southern Iran.
Both Natanz and Bushehr have been under the scrutiny of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog.
According to Nahorney, the first Stuxnet attack was launched in June 2009, with another following that July. Additional attacks were conducted in March, April and May 2010.
Although experts had previously traced the worm's development roots as far back as June 2009, there was little proof that actual attacks had begun at that time.
The worm was first publicly reported in June 2010 by VirusBlokAda, a little-known security firm based in Belarus, but only garnered attention a month later when Microsoft and Siemens -- the German electronics firm sells widely-used SCADA hardware and software -- said the worm was actively targeting Windows PCs that managed large-scale industrial-control systems in manufacturing and utility firms.
SCADA, for "supervisory control and data acquisition," are systems that run everything from power plants and factory machinery to oil pipelines and military installations.
Researchers have called Stuxnet "groundbreaking" for its sophistication, use of multiple Windows zero-day vulnerabilities and reconnaissance and testing requirements.
"Three organizations were targeted once, one was targeted twice, and another was targeted three times," said Nahorney today. Symantec has not identified the organizations or disclosed information on which of the five -- the one struck three times -- was attacked most aggressively.
Based on Symantec's earlier analysis -- and that of other experts, including Ralph Langner of Langner Communications GmbH -- most researchers have concluded that Stuxnet was crafted by a nation-backed team, and designed to cripple Iran's nuclear program.
Iran has confirmed that the worm infected at least 30,000 PCs in the country, and has admitted that Stuxnet affected the operation of some of the centrifuges used to enrich uranium. The country has blamed Israel and the U.S. for the attacks.
Last month the New York Times, citing confidential sources, said that the worm was a joint American-Israeli project, and had been tested on Iranian-style centrifuges at the latter's Dimona covert nuclear facility.
Symantec mapped Stuxnet's targets and timeline by analyzing more than 3,200 samples of the worm that had caused approximately 12,000 infections in the five organizations that had been attacked.
The company will publish an updated version of its "W32.Stuxnet Dossier" report on its Web site later today.
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His e-mail address is email@example.com.
Read more about Security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.
- Transforming Information Security: Future-Proofing Processes This report provides a valuable set of recommendations from 19 of the world'd leading security officers to help organizations build security strategies for...
- The Evolution of Corporate Cyberthreats Cybercriminals are creating and deploying new threats every day that are more destructive than ever before. While you may have more people devoted...
- 3 Questions to Ask Your DNS Host about Lowering DDoS Risks Neustar has had wide-ranging conversations with clients wanting to know how they can optimize protection as DDoS attacks increase in frequency and size.
- The Danger Deepens: 2014 Neustar Annual DDoS Attacks and Impact Report This report compares DDoS findings from 2013 to 2012, based on a survey of 440 North American companies, including 139 businesses delivering technology...
- Establish Cyber Resiliency: Developing a Continuous Response Architecture Many enterprises fail to proactively prepare the battlefield for a data breach by only leveraging outdated techniques that focus on the perimeter or...
- An Incident Response Playbook: From Monitoring to Operations As cyber-attacks grow more sophisticated, many organizations are investing more into incident detection and response capabilities. In this webcast, learn how to develop... All Cybercrime and Hacking White Papers | Webcasts