Computerworld - Verizon Wireless will start taking pre-orders for the iPhone 4 running on its CDMA/EV-DO network on Thursday, and it will begin selling the device Feb. 10.
However, judging by the inquiries received at Computerworld, many prospective customers are mulling whether to buy a Verizon iPhone 4 or wait for the enhanced iPhone 5 (or whatever it will be called), which is due this summer.
All the facts about data pricing have been laid out, including Verizon's bait of unlimited data usage for $30 per month with a two-year contract -- a deal AT&T no longer offers. While there are rumors that AT&T might reinstate the unlimited data deal, AT&T had no comment about the matter early Tuesday. Verizon will charge $199.99, the same price as AT&T, for the 16GB version of the device itself for users who sign up for a two-year contract and a data plan.
Even so, Computerworld readers and others are wondering whether they should jump to Verizon, which reportedly offers better service than AT&T, or wait for the iPhone 5 that's sure to come this summer, probably in July?
The iPhone 5 reportedly could have several enhancements that might matter to some users -- including support for Near Field Communication, which could enable the device to be used like a mobile payment card for retail purchases.
The list of iPhone 5 upgrades could also include support for video chat over 4G networks and a faster dual-core processor, according to speculation from several sources -- including Computerworld blogger Jonny Evans and the HubPages Web site.
The iPhone 5 could also have dual radio chips, possibly enabling it to run on multiple providers' networks, such as the GSM networks from AT&T and T-Mobile, and the CDMA/EV-DO networks from Verizon and Sprint Nextel.
There is also speculation that support for an iPhone running on faster LTE networks is further off, possibly in a later entry (Version 6?) from Apple, although AT&T says its HSPA+ version of GSM is a faster network that qualifies as 4G, with speeds topping 5Mbit/sec. Both AT&T and Verizon are working toward LTE, with Verizon's effort already underway.
The fact that the iPhone 5 is on the way isn't the only consideration for buyers. Network coverage and consistency will also count.
One executive secretary sent Computerworld this query via Facebook on behalf of her boss, an entrepreneur, who is still in a quandary about buying from Verizon: Would it make sense to go to Verizon's iPhone, with reportedly better service, or stick with AT&T and the potential of a coming iPhone 5? And even so, could Verizon have the iPhone 5 on its network?
The decision tree for helping this executive decide is fairly complex. Price is not a huge concern for him, but there are other factors to consider. A lot depends on how much better Verizon's service is likely to be in areas where her boss mostly uses his iPhone. He is based in the Los Angeles area, and neither the secretary nor her boss have reported many problems with AT&T's service for the iPhone there, and they don't know much about the quality of Verizon's service.
The complaints about AT&T service in recent years have come primarily from users in downtown San Francisco and in Manhattan. AT&T has admitted it faced problems in those locales, and it started upgrades to its network in those areas more than a year ago. Voice connections were the biggest concern.
Analysts say the only way to get a reliable comparison of the two networks is to use a phone over both networks in the areas where you make voice and data connections. That means at home, at work and along your commute.
Contrary to what carriers claim in their ads, every network is vulnerable to congestion, depending on how many users are on a single cell tower at once, and other factors. It helps to upgrade to HSPA+ and LTE, but that's not the only solution. Carriers regularly anticipate congestion and add cell towers and antennas in crowded areas, in addition to making other upgrades. But there can still be problems, including dropped calls, static and echoes.
Free Insider Guide
Prepaid service has started to transform from a source of cheap, bottom-of-the-barrel phones into a viable outlet for compelling smartphones. Read more...
Copyright © 1994 - 2012 Computerworld Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Computerworld Inc. is prohibited. Computerworld and Computerworld.com and the respective logos are trademarks of International Data Group Inc.
