SAP willing to pay Oracle $120M for attorney's fees
IDG News Service - SAP would pay Oracle $120 million for "past and future reasonable attorneys fees and costs" under the terms of a joint stipulation filed Monday in connection with the companies' ongoing intellectual-property lawsuit.
Oracle sued SAP in 2007, alleging that its TomorrowNow subsidiary illegally downloaded Oracle software and support materials in order to lure away Oracle customers.
Under the agreement filed Monday, TomorrowNow "stipulates to entry of judgment on Oracle's claims for violations of the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and California's Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, breach of contract, intentional interference, negligent interference, unfair competition, trespass to chattels, unjust enrichment/restitution and an accounting."
In turn, Oracle will not seek punitive damages against TomorrowNow or SAP, according to the filing in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The jury in the case, which went to trial this week, will be instructed to consider "only those damages available under the Copyright Act," it adds.
SAP must pay Oracle the $120 million by Nov. 9.
The agreement's terms are not binding until the court approves it, and either SAP or Oracle can withdraw entirely if any provisions are not accepted, it states.
Last week, SAP said it wouldn't contest the issue of "contributory infringement" -- or whether its executives knew about the software theft. The move meant the trial will hinge on damages owed to Oracle.
Oracle has pegged its total damages at north of $2 billion, while SAP had maintained they should be in the tens of millions. SAP is now poised to give Oracle far more than that sum even before the question of damages for copyright infringement is answered, despite the elimination of punitive damages.
Spokespersons for SAP and Oracle declined to comment on the stipulation.
Opening statements in the case begin today.
James Niccolai of IDG News Service contributed to this story.
Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com
- Update: SAP penalty in Oracle suit excessive, analysts say
- Update: Oracle awarded $1.3 billion in SAP lawsuit
- Oracle-SAP case goes to jury to decide damages
- SAP: Court lops $500M off Oracle's potential damages
- Ellison grilled at Oracle-SAP trial
- FBI watching Oracle-SAP trial
- Oracle licenses would have cost SAP billions, says Phillips
- Oracle, SAP duel over damages in opening arguments
- SAP willing to pay Oracle $120M for attorney's fees
- 27 things you need to know about Oracle, SAP and HP
- Top 3 Myths about Big Data Security : Debunking common misconceptions about big data security Big data represents massive business possibilities and competitive advantage for organizations that are able to harness and use that information. But how are...
- Magic Quadrant for Data Masking Technology IBM is a leader in Gartner Inc's Magic Quadrant for Data Masking Technology. Read the full report to learn about IBM.
- Best Practices for Securing Hadoop Historically, Apache Hadoop has provided limited security capabilities. To protect sensitive data being stored and analyzed in Hadoop, security architects should use a...
- Top Tips for Securing Big Data Environments: Why Big Data Doesn't Have to Mean Big Security Challenges Organizations must come to terms with the security challenges they introduce. As big data environments ingest more data, organizations will face significant risks...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Why Are Customers Really Deploying an NGFW? It seems every IT Security expert is talking about the NGFW, but what are people really doing? This webcast covers 5 real-world customer... All IT Outsourcing White Papers | Webcasts