Zoomerang vs. SurveyMonkey: Who has the better privacy?
Our privacy columnist takes a close look at the privacy policies of two leading online-survey vendors
Computerworld - Every time I send out a survey using my Zoomerang or SurveyMonkey accounts, there is always at least one wise guy among the respondents who dings me for risking their privacy with these tools. But do they have a point? Last week I decided to finally find out.
Let's call it a privacy-impact assessment (PIA) for online-survey services.
A PIA tries to answer two main questions: Will a system, process or product create risk to personal privacy? And, if so, what can be done to mitigate that risk? When I think about using these tools myself, three more questions come top of mind:
- Will the online-survey company in any way access or use my survey responses or contact lists?
- How will the company secure my survey responses?
- Does the company offer tutorials to users like me on how to conduct a survey that protects privacy?
So those are the criteria I took with me when I visited the Web sites and called the two leading online-survey products, Zoomerang and SurveyMonkey. What did I find out?
1. Similar business models
First, this is another case of a lot of personal data being stored in the northwestern United States. MarketTools parent company of Zoomerang, is based in downtown San Francisco, while SurveyMonkey maintains headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., with data operations in Portland, Ore.
Both are survivors of the dot-com bust. Walter Good and three other market-research professionals co-founded MarketTools in 1998 in the San Francisco Bay area. I spoke with Good, who pinpointed the birth of Zoomerang to a Minneapolis meeting his team had with the CIO of General Mills. Their idea was to use the Internet to revolutionize consumer research and bring it to the masses. The CIO loved the concept, and soon General Mills and Procter & Gamble were investors.
Now employing 550 people, MarketTools provides other market-research software products in addition to Zoomerang. Housed in an upscale, downtown San Francisco office building where Google takes up three floors, MarketTools also maintains concentrations of employees in Minneapolis, Chicago, New York and its European headquarters in London. The company's current leaders joined the firm in 2005 and 2006, and the company's Web site reports that strong growth occurred in 2009. Zoomerang's business model is to attract users to its free service and then entice them to upgrade to packages that run as high as $600 per year.
For its part, SurveyMonkey followed a similar trajectory. Ryan Finley launched the company in Madison, Wis., after he left college in 1999. After moving to Portland, Finley hired his brother Chris in 2002 and eventually saw revenue hit a reported $30 million in 2008. A venture-capital fund bought SurveyMonkey in 2009, installed its current management team and moved its headquarters to the Bay area. A former Yahoo executive now runs the company, which employs 31. The company's business model is also to attract users to its free service and then upsell them to a premium service, which in SurveyMonkey's case costs $240 per year.
More by Jay Cline
- Google and the privacy Richter scale
- Jay Cline: Are medical-data breaches overreported?
- iPhone location-tracking incident boosts stock of 'privacy by design'
- Survey: The best privacy advisers of 2010
- Survey: The best privacy advisers of 2010
- Zoomerang vs. SurveyMonkey: Who has the better privacy?
- Privacy software: Who are the early leaders?
- Facebook vs. LinkedIn: Which has the better privacy?
- Will the smart grid protect consumer privacy?
- Privacy matters: When is personal data truly de-identified?


- Excel 2010 Cheat Sheet
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Cheat Sheet and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, guides, product reviews and more.
- Practice Management: Double Billing Rate and Improve Patient Services
- Would you like to double your billing rate and achieve faster payment for services?
Download this customer success story to see how One Health... - Mission Critical Data Explosion and Customer Case Study
- Would you like to double your tier 1 storage capacity while simultaneously reducing your storage footprint?
Download this customer success story to see how... - Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios
- Read this new eBook to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.
- Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving
- Read the analyst report and learn how you can leverage the core capabilities of a DAP solution for better database security.
- Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional
- The options for securing increasingly valuable databases are very broad and deep, and can be confusing. This research provides an overview of three... All Privacy White Papers
- Close a Dangerous Vulnerability: Automated Methods for Managing Admin Rights
- In this exclusive webcast from Viewfinity, you'll hear how to leverage Group Policy Object settings to close this vulnerability by elevating privileges for...
- Data Protection and Disaster Recovery with iSCSI and VMware
- Get this on demand webcast now
- Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring
- View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with...
- InfoSphere Warehouse Packs Demo
- These flash modules make warehousing more tangible and relevant to business users through detailed explanations of the InfoSphere Warehouse Packs.
- Delivery Management -- Extending Lifecycle Management
- Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT
Siloed organizations continue doing the wrong things and doing things wrong, leading to increased costs,...
All Privacy Webcasts
