Mozilla unblocks one sneaky Microsoft add-on
Second component to be unblocked within 48 hours, Mozilla's top engineer says
October 19, 2009 02:57 PM ETComputerworld - Mozilla has unblocked one of the two Microsoft-made add-ons that put Firefox users at risk from attack and will probably unblock the second in the next 48 hours, the company's head of engineering said today.
"We've unblocked the .NET Framework Assistant," said Mike Shaver, Mozilla's vice president of engineering, on Monday morning. Shaver was referring to one of the two Microsoft components that Mozilla automatically disabled late Friday after deciding it needed to protect Firefox users from a critical vulnerability Microsoft disclosed, and patched, last week. "We got confirmation from Microsoft over the weekend that the add-on wasn't a[n attack] vector for the vulnerability in question," said Shaver.
Late on Friday, Mozilla added .Net Framework Assistant and the accompanying Windows Presentation Foundation plug-in to its rarely-used blocking list, which then threw up a warning to users notifying them that the pair was being barred from Firefox.
Mozilla has also pushed out a change that will let users running Firefox 3.5 override the block, added Shaver. That change came out of discussions with enterprise Firefox users who said that they needed the two components to run their .NET-based software within the browser.
The block of Windows Presentation Foundation will likely be lifted in the next two days. "Microsoft is watching the patch deployment numbers, and sharing them with us," said Shaver. "At some point, we'll take the [Windows Presentation Foundation] plug-in off the blocker. I expect that to happen in the next 48 hours."
Last week, Microsoft's security team acknowledged that its software -- which had been silently installed in Firefox as far back as February 2009 -- contained a critical vulnerability that could be used by hackers to hijack Windows PCs through Firefox. The vulnerability also affected all versions of Internet Explorer (IE), including IE8.
However, the MS09-054 bulletin, which provided details on the vulnerability, said nothing about Firefox. Later last Tuesday, Microsoft expanded on MS09-054 in a blog post, and confirmed that Firefox users were in danger.
Microsoft maintained that Firefox users who applied the patches would be safe from attack, but Mozilla felt that was not enough. Friday, Shaver cited the severity of the vulnerability and the difficulty some users have had in removing Microsoft's software as Mozilla's reasons for engaging the blocking list.
Removing the Microsoft add-on and plug-in have been a contentious issue since Microsoft first slipped them into Firefox without users' permission last February as part of the .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (SP1) update, which was delivered via Windows Update.
Users were also furious that the software was impossible to uninstall without editing the Windows registry. Later, Microsoft issued a follow-on update that made it possible to uninstall the components without a registry edit.
Firefox
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Share our Strength
Download Now
Lower the Cost and Complexity of a Mobile Workforce through Automation
Download This Resource Now!
Top 10 Things to Know about Data Protection
Download Now
Managing Mobility: Improve Data Security, Compliance and Manageability
Download This Resource Now!
Managing Secure File Transfer to Save Time, Money and IT Resources
Learn how companies are using innovative technology to overcome these challenges and improve user productivity by offloading e-mail attachments and replacing FTP with...
Ponemon Study: The Business Risk of a Lost Laptop
Download Now
Security Convergence Equals Network Security Cost Savings
Listen to IBM Internet Security Systems' take on network security convergence.
Airport Insecurity: The Case of Lost Laptops
Download Now
Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance
How long can your Enterprise afford to be without your data? With an accelerated disaster recovery program, you never have to answer this...
