Skip the navigation

Report: DOJ reviewing U.S. telecom deals with handset makers

There are concerns the exclusivity deals are anti-competitive

By Nancy Gohring
July 6, 2009 01:24 PM ET

IDG News Service - The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has begun to look into the way that large operators form exclusivity agreements for popular handsets over concerns that the practice is anticompetitive, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal citing unnamed people familiar with the matter.

According to the report, published online on Monday, the DOJ may be looking broadly at ways that large telecom operators, including AT&T and Verizon, may be acting anticompetitively. Other issues include ways that operators restrict the kinds of services that can be offered on their networks, the Journal reported.

The DOJ does reveal when it is officially investigating a matter. It hasn't yet in this case, which could mean it is now considering whether to launch an official investigation. The agency did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The agency declined to comment for this story.

Public interest groups applauded the news of a potential investigation. "The focus of the Department's investigation should be on the clearly anti-competitive rates, terms and conditions imposed by AT&T and Verizon on the high-capacity broadband market," wrote the NoChokepoints coalition, a group that urges the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to do more to improve competition in the broadband market, in a statement.

Public Knowledge, a public interest group, also supports a DOJ investigation. "Consumers have suffered over the past 10 years as the industry has consolidated and strengthened its hold over which services can be offered and which equipment can be used. Competition is almost nonexistent in crucial services for home and business use," Gigi Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, said in a statement.

If the DOJ does launch an official investigation, it will be a direct result of the change at the White House, and not because of any specific new kinds of deals or services, said Evan Stewart, a lawyer with Zuckerman Spaeder who practices antitrust law. "Clearly, the Obama administration and the people they've installed at the Justice Department and the [Federal Trade Commission] have made it clear they view antitrust laws differently than the Bush people," he said.

While the investigators may be interested in the telecom segment, in part because of the way it's grown, they may ultimately have trouble making a case, he said. When companies in an industry grow primarily through market consolidation, rather than internal growth, antitrust questions arise, he said. The dominant telecom providers have all grown into their positions through acquisitions.

However, particularly in mobile, no one provider has a big enough market share to cause concern, he said. Even the largest operator, Verizon, has less than 30% market share.

Reprinted with permission from Story copyright 2014 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Our Commenting Policies