Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Hardware
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Judge kills Broadcom patent lawsuit against Qualcomm

Says chip maker was hazy about which patents it claimed were in violation

March 16, 2009 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service - WASHINGTON - A U.S. judge has dismissed a patent lawsuit brought by chip maker Broadcom Corp. against rival Qualcomm Inc., saying the company didn't identify specific patents it was suing over.

Judge William Hayes of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California dismissed the Broadcom complaint last Thursday. The judgment was made available late Friday.

Broadcom has a separate patent lawsuit pending against Qualcomm in the same district court. The two companies have filed several patent lawsuits against each other in recent years.

In this lawsuit, Broadcom had argued that Qualcomm was unfairly limiting competition by putting excessive conditions in its patent licensing terms. Qualcomm licensed its chip-set-related patents to other chip makers on the condition that they only sell their products to mobile-handset makers that also have Qualcomm patent licenses. Broadcom alleged that those license agreements were anticompetitive and discouraged handset makers from using technology from other companies.

Qualcomm's actions violated the U.S. legal doctrine called patent exhaustion, which generally recognizes that downstream buyers of products containing patented technologies don't have to negotiate a separate license agreement with the original patent holder, Broadcom alleged.

In November, Qualcomm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, saying Broadcom had failed "to specify a single device, a single patent, a single license, or a single sale" in its lawsuit.

Hayes agreed. "Although Broadcom acknowledges that Qualcomm possesses thousands of patents relating to wireless chipsets and handsets, Broadcom does not identify with any specificity the patents which it requests that the court declare exhausted," he wrote. "The court cannot make this determination on the facts as alleged in the complaint because Broadcom does not identify with any specificity a patent that was substantially embodied in a chipset or handset, or an exhaustion triggering sale or license."

Broadcom said in a statement that it intends to refile the lawsuit within two weeks.

Representatives of Qualcomm weren't immediately available for comment.


Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

Jump to comments

Broadcom

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

What People Are Saying

IT Jobs