Safari 4 rivals Google Chrome in JavaScript race
Apple's new browser is 38% faster than Firefox
February 25, 2009 12:00 PM ETComputerworld - Contrary to Apple's claims, the newest version of Safari is not the world's fastest browser, benchmark scores show. But it is dramatically faster than rivals being built by Mozilla and Microsoft.
According to JavaScript rendering tests run by Computerworld, the public beta of Safari 4 is in a virtual dead heat with the most recent edition of Google's Chrome. However, it is 38% faster than the newest version of Firefox -- more than three times faster than the production edition of the open-source browser -- and more than five times faster than Microsoft's Internet Explorer 8.
Computerworld ran the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark suite in Windows XP three times for each browser and then averaged the scores. (See graph at bottom of page.)
Safari 4, which Apple released yesterday as a public beta, scored just slightly higher than Chrome 2.0.164.0, a developer-only build of Google's browser that was issued only last week. The difference, however, was minute: Google was only about 7% faster. Although Chrome and Safari are both built around the same open-source WebKit engine, they use different JavaScript engines. The former features Google's own V8 engine, while Safari 4 relies on Apple's new Nitro.
That new engine was most in evidence when Safari 4's scores are compared with those of Safari 3.2.2, the current shipping version on Windows: The beta of Safari 4 was about 3.7 times faster.
Safari 4 also proved faster than the newest Firefox, a nightly build in the run-up to Firefox 3.1 -- although at just 38% faster, its edge was much smaller.
It easily beat Firefox 3.0.6, Mozilla's production browser, and IE8 Release Candidate 1 (RC1), Microsoft's latest public release of its still-under-construction successor to the three-year-old IE7. According to SunSpider's tests, Safari 4 is nearly 3.5 times faster than Firefox and about 5.6 times faster than IE8.
When IE7 is brought into the picture, Safari 4 looks lightning-quick: Apple's browser is more than 76 times faster at completing the JavaScript tests than Microsoft's.
Most browser makers have been aggressively promoting improved JavaScript performance for months. Google, for example, bragged up Chrome's when it debuted the browser last September, while Mozilla has been talking up Firefox 3.1's TraceMonkey engine since August.
Microsoft, however, has disparaged the benchmark bragging as a "browser drag race" that it's not interested in joining. Instead, senior product manager James Pratt has tried to steer the conversation away from JavaScript and toward a more subjective interpretation.
"We're at the point, with what people do in the browser, that users can't really tell the difference between browsers," he has argued. "Beyond building a performance lab, which we've done, it's very difficult to tell which browser is fastest. The reality is that for most users, they'll all be comparable."
On the Mac, where Safari doesn't have to compete with Google -- Chrome has yet to be ported to Apple's operating system -- the beta of Version 4 is almost twice as fast as Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 and nearly four times faster than Firefox 3.0.6, according to SunSpider tests run on a 2.4-GHz "unibody" MacBook.
Apple
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Southern Company
Download Now
Extending Client Refresh - 11 Steps to Maximize Savings
Register Now!
Defending Against the Storm
Download Now
Lower the Cost and Complexity of a Mobile Workforce through Automation
Download This Resource Now!
Share our Strength
Download Now
Managing Mobility: Improve Data Security, Compliance and Manageability
Download This Resource Now!
Consolidate Your Servers and Storage to Lower Costs with Oracle Database 11g
Register for this webcast!
Top 10 Things to Know about Data Protection
Download Now
The Commercialization of ITIL: Lessons Learned
Register for this event today!
Computerworld Reports
Disaster Recovery & Cost Savings Zone
Thousands of customers world-wide have turned to virtualization solutions from Riverbed as a way to reduce costs.
