Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Networking
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Safari 4 rivals Google Chrome in JavaScript race

Apple's new browser is 38% faster than Firefox

February 25, 2009 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - Contrary to Apple's claims, the newest version of Safari is not the world's fastest browser, benchmark scores show. But it is dramatically faster than rivals being built by Mozilla and Microsoft.

According to JavaScript rendering tests run by Computerworld, the public beta of Safari 4 is in a virtual dead heat with the most recent edition of Google's Chrome. However, it is 38% faster than the newest version of Firefox -- more than three times faster than the production edition of the open-source browser -- and more than five times faster than Microsoft's Internet Explorer 8.

Computerworld ran the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark suite in Windows XP three times for each browser and then averaged the scores. (See graph at bottom of page.)

Safari 4, which Apple released yesterday as a public beta, scored just slightly higher than Chrome 2.0.164.0, a developer-only build of Google's browser that was issued only last week. The difference, however, was minute: Google was only about 7% faster. Although Chrome and Safari are both built around the same open-source WebKit engine, they use different JavaScript engines. The former features Google's own V8 engine, while Safari 4 relies on Apple's new Nitro.

That new engine was most in evidence when Safari 4's scores are compared with those of Safari 3.2.2, the current shipping version on Windows: The beta of Safari 4 was about 3.7 times faster.

Safari 4 also proved faster than the newest Firefox, a nightly build in the run-up to Firefox 3.1 -- although at just 38% faster, its edge was much smaller.

It easily beat Firefox 3.0.6, Mozilla's production browser, and IE8 Release Candidate 1 (RC1), Microsoft's latest public release of its still-under-construction successor to the three-year-old IE7. According to SunSpider's tests, Safari 4 is nearly 3.5 times faster than Firefox and about 5.6 times faster than IE8.

When IE7 is brought into the picture, Safari 4 looks lightning-quick: Apple's browser is more than 76 times faster at completing the JavaScript tests than Microsoft's.

Most browser makers have been aggressively promoting improved JavaScript performance for months. Google, for example, bragged up Chrome's when it debuted the browser last September, while Mozilla has been talking up Firefox 3.1's TraceMonkey engine since August.

Microsoft, however, has disparaged the benchmark bragging as a "browser drag race" that it's not interested in joining. Instead, senior product manager James Pratt has tried to steer the conversation away from JavaScript and toward a more subjective interpretation.

"We're at the point, with what people do in the browser, that users can't really tell the difference between browsers," he has argued. "Beyond building a performance lab, which we've done, it's very difficult to tell which browser is fastest. The reality is that for most users, they'll all be comparable."

On the Mac, where Safari doesn't have to compete with Google -- Chrome has yet to be ported to Apple's operating system -- the beta of Version 4 is almost twice as fast as Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 and nearly four times faster than Firefox 3.0.6, according to SunSpider tests run on a 2.4-GHz "unibody" MacBook.

Apple Safari 4
SunSpider benchmark results show Google's Chrome and Apple's Safari 4 are the fastest Windows browsers at rendering JavaScript. (Lower scores are better.)


Jump to comments

Apple

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.

What People Are Saying