Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Security
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Oops! Mozilla forgets Firefox 2 patch, must reissue update

It's 'embarrassing,' but users are not at risk, says browser maker

December 17, 2008 12:00 PM ET

Active Comments
Anonymous says: Firefox 2 is no way faster than Firefox 3 in Javascript performance. It's always at least 5-10 times slower in...
Anonymous says: Again, you're a liar. Every benchmark and every site reports Firefox 3's Javascript performance is much faster than Firefox 2's...


Computerworld - A "clerical error" by Mozilla Corp. omitted one of the security patches that was supposed to be included in the Windows version of yesterday's Firefox 2.0.0.19 release, a company executive said today.

"We don't believe users are at risk right now," said Mike Beltzner, director of Firefox. Beltzner declined to pinpoint the missing patch -- one of 10 in the update -- to make it more difficult for attackers to take advantage of the snafu. "I can tell you that it's not one of the severe vulnerabilities and there are no known exploits for it," he said.

Mozilla will release Firefox 2.0.0.20, which will include the omitted patch, as early as Friday and no later than Monday.

Yesterday's update was supposed to be the last for Firefox 2.0, which is slated for retirement. Instead, Mozilla plans to call it quits with Firefox 2.0.0.20.

Only the Windows version was affected by the omission; the Mac and Linux editions contain all 10 fixes.

"Due to a clerical error, and this is embarrassing, we forgot to include one of the patches," said Beltzner. "That means Firefox 2.0.0.19 is not identical across platforms."

Firefox 2.0.0.19 was supposed to include five patches labeled "critical," one "high," two "moderate" and two "low" in Mozilla's four-step scoring system. Of the four in the two less-severe categories, the most serious could be used by attackers to steal information from a user while browsing.

As per its policy, Mozilla was to officially retire the older browser Tuesday, but it must now delay that until Version 2.0.0.20 is available. Mozilla has been aggressively urging users to upgrade to Firefox 3.0, which was launched last June, and since then has twice offered Firefox 2.0 users an update, most recently two weeks ago. Mozilla estimated today that approximately 2 million users have accepted the second upgrade.

The company plans to make one final offer early next month.

When Mozilla wraps up its testing, it will post Firefox 2.0.0.20 on its Web site for download. Users will also be able to retrieve it via Firefox's built-in updater, or they can wait for the automatic update notification to appear.

Mozilla isn't the only software maker that has had to reissue an update. Last June, for example, Microsoft Corp. rereleased a patch for Windows XP's implementation of Bluetooth because the fix didn't really fix anything. And in September, Apple Inc. was forced to repeat a release of iTunes 8.0 after a buggy driver crashed Windows Vista PCs with the dreaded "blue screen of death."

Read more about security in Computerworld's Security Knowledge Center.



Jump to comments

Mozilla

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

What People Are Saying

White Papers & Webcasts

Death to PST Files
Download Now  

Web 2.0, Social Media and the Dark Web - A Web Criminals Paradise?
In this discussion, learn about the challenges of protecting your users from the potentially unsafe content hidden in the "Dark Web".

eGuide: Enterprise Security
Smart Security Strategies for 2010. Read now!  

Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance
How long can your Enterprise afford to be without your data? With an accelerated disaster recovery program, you never have to answer this...


IT Jobs