Update: Hackers launch PDF attacks, exploit just-patched Reader bug
Antivirus defenses worthless, says researcher; users urged to patch ASAP
November 7, 2008 12:00 PM ETComputerworld - Attackers are exploiting one of the vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader that was patched earlier this week, security researchers warned today.
Adobe confirmed the attacks, and urged users to update the software to version 9 immediately, or if that's not possible, to deploy the patched version of Reader 8.
According to Bojan Zdrnja, an analyst at the SANS Institute's Internet Storm Center (ISC), malicious PDF (Portable Document Format) files are circulating that infect systems by exploiting one of the eight bugs Adobe Systems Inc. patched Tuesday.
"This is not surprising, though, as a fully working [proof-of-concept] has been recently published," said Zdrnja in an alert posted to the ISC site early Friday. "But it's interesting to see that the attackers modified the proof-of-concept little bit, probably in order to evade anti-virus detection."
Shortly before Adobe patched the older Reader 8.1.2, Core Security Technologies, a security company that had reported the bug to Adobe in May, published sample attack code as part of its own advisory about the danger posed by rogue PDF files.
The malicious PDFs examined by Zdrnja contained a variation of the Core Security code. "Parts of the publicly-posted proof-of-concept are visible, but the attackers also modified certain parts," he said. "This was probably enough to fool the [anti-virus] vendors."
In fact, that was the result, Zdrnja argued. As of 11 a.m. EST, no anti-virus company had yet released a detection signature that could finger the malformed PDF files.
Kevin Haley, a director of security response at Symantec Corp., seconded Zdrnja's findings a little later on Friday. "We've seen this out in the wild as well," said Haley, "although it doesn't seem to be widespread at the moment." Haley added that Symantec had issued anti-virus signatures to its customers since Zdrnja posted his alert.
A second attack PDF, published to the milw0rm.com site on Wednesday, is slightly more visible to anti-virus vendors. The proof-of-concept PDF is currently identified by about 14% of anti-virus vendors, according to VirusTotal, a free scanning and reporting service.
"If you haven't patched your Adobe Reader installations, do it ASAP as the attacks are in the wild," Zdrnja urged.
Adobe echoed that. "We strongly recommend users update to Adobe Reader 9, which is not vulnerable to this issue," the company said in an e-mail Friday. "Users of Acrobat 8 and Adobe Reader 8 who can't update to Adobe Reader 9 should install the 8.1.3 update to protect themselves."
The nimbleness demonstrated by the attacks is not new. "It's not unusual at all," Haley said, talking about the short span between Adobe's patching and exploits executing. And the fact that Core Security published proof-of-concept attack code certainly played a part, he added. "Once the code is out there, anyone can pick it up, modify it and use it," said Haley.
Adobe
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Share our Strength
Download Now
Lower the Cost and Complexity of a Mobile Workforce through Automation
Download This Resource Now!
Top 10 Things to Know about Data Protection
Download Now
Managing Mobility: Improve Data Security, Compliance and Manageability
Download This Resource Now!
Managing Secure File Transfer to Save Time, Money and IT Resources
Learn how companies are using innovative technology to overcome these challenges and improve user productivity by offloading e-mail attachments and replacing FTP with...
Ponemon Study: The Business Risk of a Lost Laptop
Download Now
Security Convergence Equals Network Security Cost Savings
Listen to IBM Internet Security Systems' take on network security convergence.
Airport Insecurity: The Case of Lost Laptops
Download Now
Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance
How long can your Enterprise afford to be without your data? With an accelerated disaster recovery program, you never have to answer this...
