Microsoft sticks with 'Windows 7' for next OS

More

Windows 7: Vista Reloaded

• With Windows 7, Microsoft gets it right
• Image gallery: Windows 7 up close
• John Brandon: Linux, Microsoft, Mac: Meet your real competitor
• SJVN: The big Windows 7 lie
• Opinion: 10 best features in Windows 7 for IT pros
• How Windows 7 will, and won't, work better with SSDs
• Better battery life, faster boot times with Windows 7, Microsoft says
• Windows 7 leaks to Web
• New math for Microsoft, as Windows 7 = addition by subtraction

Windows 7: Full coverage

Computerworld - Microsoft Corp. announced today that the code name for its next operating system, Windows 7, will be the product's official name.

Mike Nash, vice president of Windows product management, said the company was sticking with the label for simplicity's sake. "Simply put, this is the seventh release of Windows, so therefore 'Windows 7' just makes sense," Nash wrote in Microsoft's Vista blog on Monday.

After noting that Microsoft has at times stuck a date on the operating system -- Windows 2000 was the latest example -- Nash said that didn't make sense this time. "We do not ship new versions of Windows every year," he said. "Likewise, coming up with an all-new 'aspirational' name [such as 'Windows XP'] does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Vista into the next generation of Windows."

Some Windows watchers, however, questioned Nash's claim that Windows 7 would be the seventh iteration of the operating system. The AeroXperience blog counted seven as of Windows Vista, and eight if the consumer-oriented Windows Millennium was included. However, only if kernel revisions are tallied, XP wasn't counted -- and Windows kernel was incremented to 7.0 for Windows 7 -- would that reckoning work, the blog argued.

According to the Windows timeline on Wikipedia, XP's kernel is tagged as 5.1, and Vista's as 6.0.

Microsoft's own version of its client operating system timeline ends with Windows XP, but it assumes nine editions as of Vista: Windows 3.0, NT, 95, NT Workstation, 98, Millennium, 2000, XP and Vista. By that timeline, Microsoft doesn't regard Windows 1.0, which it released in 1985, or Windows 2.0, launched in 1987, as "true" Windows.

More than two weeks ago, Microsoft had said it would issue an alpha version of Windows 7 to attendees of its Professional Developers Conference (PDC) and Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC), which open Oct. 27 and Nov. 5, respectively. Today, Nash called that preview a "prebeta developer-only release."

It's unusual for Microsoft to use an operating system code name as the official product moniker, and Nash acknowledged that fact. "I am pretty sure that this is a first for Windows," he said.

Operating system code names at Microsoft have ranged from "Chicago," which was the name for what became Windows 95, and "Memphis" (Windows 98), to "Whistler" (Windows XP) and "Longhorn" (Windows Vista).

Microsoft has not pinned a ship date to Windows 7, but it has said it was shooting for three years after the release of Vista, which would mean it would be released late in 2009 or early in 2010.

Perhaps not coincidentally, Windows blogger Ed Bott wondered just last week whether Microsoft would keep the "7" tag for its next operating system. Nearly half his readers who responded to an online poll gave the nod to "None of the above," but 20% voted for "Windows 2010," 14% for Windows 2009 and 7% for "Windows Vista R2."

"Windows 7" received 15% of the votes in the poll.