Apple asks judge to make iPhone lawsuit moot
Dropped-call suit should be dismissed since unhappy users didn't seek refund, lawyers say
Computerworld - Apple Inc. has asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit brought by dissatisfied iPhone 3G owners because they did not ask the company to repair their iPhones or refund their money, according to court papers made public on Friday.
In the motion, Apple's lawyers moved to dismiss the suit filed in August by an Alabama woman who said her iPhone 3G dropped calls, couldn't reliably connect to AT&T Inc.'s network and was slower than advertised.
"The defective iPhone 3G appeared to connect to the 3G standard and protocol less than 25% of the time," Jessica Smith's suit said. "Additionally, [the] plaintiff experienced an inordinate amount of dropped calls." Smith was later joined by another iPhone owner, Wilton Triggs, in the lawsuit, which has also sought class-action status.
IPhone users began complaining about making calls and keeping a connection within days of the smart phone's July 11 debut. Since then, Apple has released a pair of iPhone software updates, including one in September that seemed to solve network problems for some users.
On Friday, however, Apple said the lawsuit should be tossed out.
"Plaintiffs' amended complaint conspicuously omits one critical condition precedent to all three causes of action: an allegation that they contacted Apple to seek a repair of the alleged defects or a replacement iPhone 3G under Apple's one-year limited warranty," Apple's attorneys argued.
By Alabama law, as well as the terms of Apple's warranty, consumers are required to ask for repair, a replacement or a refund before filing a lawsuit, Apple said. "Plaintiffs do not allege that they notified Apple of the alleged problems they experienced or otherwise attempted to obtain a repair or replacement under warranty," the motion continued. "Instead, plaintiffs allege that Apple is generally 'aware of the above-stated defects' and has 'attempted to undertake corrective action too late with little or no success.'"
Apple's motion for dismissal cited sections of the Alabama Commercial Code, Apple's own warranty and other legal precedents in moving that the judge make Smith's lawsuit moot.
Two weeks after Smith sued Apple, a New Jersey man filed a separate lawsuit in federal court. Like Smith, Eulardi Tanseco said his iPhone dropped calls and wouldn't consistently connect with AT&T's network.
Apple has not filed a response to those charges.
Read more about Legal in Computerworld's Legal Topic Center.
- 5 Customers Deliver Virtual Desktops and Apps to Empower a Modern Workforce Learn how Citrix solutions helped 5 companies realize the full value of desktop virtualization through a project-by-project approach based on key business priorities.
- Top 10 Reasons to Strengthen Information Security with Desktop Virtualization Regain control and reduce risk without sacrificing business productivity and growth
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Client Virtualization Software 2013 Vendor Assessment IDC has placed Citrix in the 2013 IDC MarketScape Leaders Category once again noting that, "Citrix's position reflects the company's market leadership and...
- Infographic: Top Use Cases for Desktop Virtualization A wide range of business issues is driving IT toward desktop virtualization. One solution-Citrix XenDesktop with FlexCast technology-helps IT teams empower their entire...
- What Does it Take to Deliver a Superior Customer Experience? The Two Top-Rated Online Retailers, B&H Photo and Crutchfield Electronics, Share Their Secrets Discuss practical CX tools and service methods such as contact center agents and the use of realtime speech analytics to help contact center...
- Keep Servers Up and Running and Attackers in the Dark An SSL/TLS handshake requires at least 10 times more processing power on a server than on the client. SSL renegotiation attacks can readily... All Legal White Papers | Webcasts