Palm Beach County's election woes continue
Recounted votes don't match up with ballots cast
Computerworld - Two weeks after Palm Beach County's Aug. 26 primary, election officials still don't know why the number of paper ballots they've recounted aren't matching up with the number of ballots that were cast in the primary.
After multiple recounts using optical-scanning machines and manual hand counts, the numbers aren't in agreement, said Robert Weiner, an administrative aide to Arthur Anderson, the county's supervisor of elections. Last week, Weiner said he believed the discrepancy was probably the result of boxes of ballots that weren't reprocessed as part of the recounts, but the controversy continues.
Election workers have been continuing the recounts around the clock since the election to try to resolve the discrepancies, Weiner said, but even a state-mandated random audit of one voting precinct came out wrong. In the random audit of one precinct, 144 ballots were counted but the vote tally was one higher, or 145 votes.
"Does that mean we have a fault in our electronic equipment? Does that mean we have a fault in the counting, such as a human error?" Weiner asked. The next step, he said, "is to look to see whether there was something improperly tabulated by computers or humans.
"We have to figure out why [this happened] and sometimes there is no answer," he said. "In this case, there appears to be no direct answer."
The recounts of the past two weeks were conducted because of a race for a judgeship that was separated by 17 votes, triggering a mandated recount to check the results.
The problems continued when the recounts found varying total numbers of ballots. On election night, the county reported that 102,523 paper ballots were filled out by voters, but the ensuing hand recounts tallied up only 98,775 ballots or about 101,000 ballots.
"So unfortunately, this is a mess and we come off looking very poorly, where in fact we are a group of tremendously dedicated professionals," Weiner said.
This is the first time that the county is using the paper-based, optical-scanning balloting system from Sequoia Voting Systems in Oakland, Calif. Previously, the county used touch-screen, or direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines. The DREs have been largely replaced by the optically scanned paper ballots under a July 1 state mandate to move to a more reliable system that maintains a paper record of ballots cast.
"You have to remember that this is brand new equipment ... that we have not used before [and] was thrust on us by the legislature ... at a time when national elections are pending," Weiner said. "This is now the equipment that we have, and this is the situation that we are in."
- Mobile First: Securing Information Sprawl Learn how the partnership between Box and MobileIron can help you execute a "mobile first" strategy that manages and secures both mobile apps...
- Cybersecurity Imperatives: Reinvent your Network Security The Rise of CyberSecurity
- Surescripts Case Study- Securing Keys and Certificates Surescripts implemented Venafi's Trust Protection Platform™ to secure digital keys and certificates, ensure the privacy and confidentiality of electronic clinical information for its...
- Ponemon 2014 SSH Security Vulnerability Report According to research by the Ponemon Institute, 3 out of 4 enterprises have no security controls in place for SSH which leaves organizations...
- Responding to New SSL Cybersecurity Threat The featured Gartner research examines current strategies to address new SSL cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.
- Deep Dive into Advanced Networking and Security with Hybrid Cloud Security and networking are among the top concerns when moving workloads to the cloud. VMware vCloud® Hybrid Service™ enables you to extend your... All Security White Papers | Webcasts
Our new bimonthly Internet of Things newsletter helps you keep pace with the rapidly evolving technologies, trends and developments related to the IoT. Subscribe now and stay up to date!