ICANN blames June site hijack on registrar
Though it didn't name the registrar, a WHOIS search fingers Register.com
July 7, 2008 12:00 PM ETComputerworld - The international organization that oversees the Web's top-level domain naming system said that the hijacking last month of several of its domains was the result of a security breach at the registrar that manages those URLs.
Although it did not name the registrar explicitly, according to WHOIS searches, New York-based Register.com manages the domains that were redirected, as well as the primary Icann.org and Iana.org domains.
Two weeks ago, Turkish hackers rerouted traffic to some of the domains used by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and one of its subsidiary organizations, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).
Visitors who intended to reach Iana.com, Iana-servers.com, Icann.com and Icann.net on June 26 were instead shunted to an illegitimate destination that displayed a taunting message: "You think that you control the domains but you don't! Everybody knows wrong. We control the domains including ICANN! Don't you believe us?"
Through its IANA subsidiary, ICANN manages the DNS root zone and assigns the DNS operators for the Internet's top-level domains, such as .com and .org. DNS, which translates the domains and URLs — such as Computerworld.com — into IP addresses, is a critical component of the Web's traffic-guiding infrastructure. ICANN, meanwhile, manages the assignment of domain names and IP addresses.
Although an ICANN spokesman provided a terse explanation shortly after the attack, only last week did the organization provide more information. In a statement posted to its Web site on Thursday, ICANN said the attack had been launched against the Internet registrar responsible for the victimized domains, not against the organization itself.
"The DNS redirect was a result of an attack on ICANN's registrar's systems," said ICANN. "A full, confidential, security report from that registrar has since been provided to ICANN with respect to this attack."
According to ICANN, the attack was two-pronged. "It would appear the attack was sophisticated, combining both social and technological techniques, but was also limited and focused," the organization said. "The redirect was noticed and corrected within 20 minutes; however, it may have taken anywhere up to 48 hours for the redirect to be entirely removed from the Internet."
While ICANN said it is "confident" that new measures will prevent a repeat of the embarrassing incident, it also acknowledged that it has launched an internal review of its security procedures.
Register.com did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
ICANN
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Share our Strength
Download Now
Lower the Cost and Complexity of a Mobile Workforce through Automation
Download This Resource Now!
Top 10 Things to Know about Data Protection
Download Now
Managing Mobility: Improve Data Security, Compliance and Manageability
Download This Resource Now!
Managing Secure File Transfer to Save Time, Money and IT Resources
Learn how companies are using innovative technology to overcome these challenges and improve user productivity by offloading e-mail attachments and replacing FTP with...
Ponemon Study: The Business Risk of a Lost Laptop
Download Now
Security Convergence Equals Network Security Cost Savings
Listen to IBM Internet Security Systems' take on network security convergence.
Airport Insecurity: The Case of Lost Laptops
Download Now
Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance
How long can your Enterprise afford to be without your data? With an accelerated disaster recovery program, you never have to answer this...
