Major ISPs sue hundreds of spammers

IDG News Service - Four major U.S. Internet service providers are suing more than 220 alleged spammers responsible for sending out hundreds of millions of pieces of unsolicited commercial e-mail, the companies announced today.
The six lawsuits, filed late yesterday by America Online Inc., EarthLink Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc., target the worst spammers using "outlaw tactics," said Mike Callahan, senior vice president and general counsel at Yahoo. The lawsuits are among the first filed under a new U.S. law called the CAN-SPAM (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing) Act, which went into effect in January.
"If you're a spammer ... this is not a great day for you," said Randall Boe, AOL's executive vice president and general counsel. "Ultimately, we're going to locate you and sue you."
The lawsuits, filed in federal courts in California, Virginia, Georgia and Washington state, name just five individuals and five companies, with at least 215 other defendants as unnamed "John Does." The companies said they are confident that they can use the expanded law enforcement tools available under CAN-SPAM to identify the unnamed defendants and shut them down.
"We're only a couple of subpoenas away from standing on someone's doorstep," said Les Seagraves, vice president, chief privacy officer and assistant general counsel at EarthLink.
The four plaintiffs couldn't give an exact number of spammers targeted in the lawsuits, because they are still investigating the cases. The companies are sharing information in order to track and identify spammers. They were unable to calculate what percentage of their spam traffic was caused by the defendants, with representatives saying only that the defendants have sent hundreds of millions of pieces of spam.
The alleged spammers targeted in the lawsuits include those sending out advertisements for penis enlargement pills, weight loss supplements, adult content Web sites, mortgage offers, cable descramblers, university diplomas and Viagra, among other products. The spam identified in the lawsuits violates one or more sections of the CAN-SPAM law, including the use of false "from" addresses and the lack of a physical address in the e-mail or an option to unsubscribe. Much of the spam also advertised illegal products or used deceptive advertising, according to the service providers.
Although many of the defendants use computers outside the U.S. to send the spam, the plaintiffs believe they will be able to use the CAN-SPAM law to bring the defendants into U.S. court, said Nancy Anderson, deputy general counsel at Microsoft. Spammers who believe the U.S. can't prosecute them because they operate offshore believe a "myth," Anderson