Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Networking
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Sizing up Microsoft and Yahoo: Did anybody win?

Microsoft did the smart thing, while Yahoo needs to act fast or face shareholder wrath, analysts say

May 4, 2008 12:00 PM ET

Active Comments
Anonymous says: I use Yahoo every day, all day. I just wonder how badly MSFT would screw it up. I know it...
Quinn the Eskimo says: Let us count the ways in which this has been one of 2008's most entertaining stories, shall we? First, and...


Computerworld - Now that Microsoft Corp. has dropped its bid to take over Yahoo Inc., industry analysts assessed what happened and what to expect from the two companies.

Microsoft gave up its effort to acquire Yahoo because the software company decided it wasn't worth the cost and potential negative publicity involved with a proxy fight, said Marc Edelman, a law professor at New York Law School and a former antitrust lawyer, in an e-mail. Either that, or Microsoft figured it couldn't win in a proxy fight, he said.

In the coming weeks, however, Edelman said it's likely that Microsoft will increase the pressure on the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the proposed advertising joint venture between Yahoo and Google Inc.

"If the DOJ does not act vigilantly, I would not be shocked to see Microsoft file a suit itself," he said.

Microsoft strategy didn't work

Rob Enderle, principle analyst at Enderle Group in San Jose, said Microsoft's initial strategy was to overbid its offer so the company could close the deal with Yahoo quickly. (Microsoft on Feb. 1 offered $44.6 billion in cash and stock, a 62% premium over Yahoo's closing price at the time.) However, Enderle noted, Microsoft didn't leave Yahoo's board with an option that allowed it to exit the process looking like it had negotiated strongly.

"The end result was that the two sides couldn't come together," Enderle said in an e-mail. "Given what we know of Google and its ability to manipulate situations that favor it, it wouldn't surprise me if [Google] had something to do with how badly this went. However, Google wanted the two firms focused on each other and not on Google, [but] Microsoft's exit ends that." Meanwhile, Enderle said, Yahoo now has a serious problem because the company's shares could tank, and angry shareholders may pursue a lawsuit.

"[Yahoo] will need to come up with a plan quickly to increase the perception of value for the firm and to take the pressure off the executive staff and board," he said. "The board is up for election, and this won't bode well for them."

Conversely, Microsoft will most likely be rewarded for walking away from the acquisition because the market didn't like the deal, Enderle said.

"Microsoft couldn't really afford the distraction of a merger anyway, and its financials reflect that," he said. "In addition, the merger attempt opened up opportunities with News Corp. and Time Warner Inc. that may have not existed before and may actually turn out to be both less risky and, in the end, more lucrative than [a deal with] Yahoo would have been. We'll see, but I expect Microsoft will be spending some time looking into what Google was doing while it was distracted."



Jump to comments

Microsoft

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

What People Are Saying

White Papers & Webcasts

Death to PST Files
Download Now  

Business Process Framework Demo
Learn about Configurable Business Processes and Calculated Fields. Watch Now!

A Green Architectural Strategy That Puts IT in the Black
Levergage green computing across your data center. Read more now.  

Manager Experience Demo
Go beyond self-service solutions to perform more effectively. Watch Now.

Quantifying the Business Value of VMware View
Learn why you should invest in a centralized virtual desktop.  

Asia-Pacific Enterprise Network Solutions
Learn through this Webcast how your business can achieve reliability, performance and value in hard-to-reach locations within the Asia-Pacific region.

Mainsoft Webcast w/ Forrester Research: Drive SharePoint Adoption in Lotus Notes Shops
How can you drive mainstream user adoption of Microsoft SharePoint when your users rely on Lotus Notes?

Disaster Recovery & Cost Savings Zone
Thousands of customers world-wide have turned to virtualization solutions from Riverbed as a way to reduce costs.



IT Jobs