Sizing up Microsoft and Yahoo: Did anybody win?
Microsoft did the smart thing, while Yahoo needs to act fast or face shareholder wrath, analysts say
May 4, 2008 12:00 PM ETComputerworld - Now that Microsoft Corp. has dropped its bid to take over Yahoo Inc., industry analysts assessed what happened and what to expect from the two companies.
Microsoft gave up its effort to acquire Yahoo because the software company decided it wasn't worth the cost and potential negative publicity involved with a proxy fight, said Marc Edelman, a law professor at New York Law School and a former antitrust lawyer, in an e-mail. Either that, or Microsoft figured it couldn't win in a proxy fight, he said.
In the coming weeks, however, Edelman said it's likely that Microsoft will increase the pressure on the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the proposed advertising joint venture between Yahoo and Google Inc.
"If the DOJ does not act vigilantly, I would not be shocked to see Microsoft file a suit itself," he said.
Microsoft strategy didn't work
Rob Enderle, principle analyst at Enderle Group in San Jose, said Microsoft's initial strategy was to overbid its offer so the company could close the deal with Yahoo quickly. (Microsoft on Feb. 1 offered $44.6 billion in cash and stock, a 62% premium over Yahoo's closing price at the time.) However, Enderle noted, Microsoft didn't leave Yahoo's board with an option that allowed it to exit the process looking like it had negotiated strongly.
"The end result was that the two sides couldn't come together," Enderle said in an e-mail. "Given what we know of Google and its ability to manipulate situations that favor it, it wouldn't surprise me if [Google] had something to do with how badly this went. However, Google wanted the two firms focused on each other and not on Google, [but] Microsoft's exit ends that." Meanwhile, Enderle said, Yahoo now has a serious problem because the company's shares could tank, and angry shareholders may pursue a lawsuit.
"[Yahoo] will need to come up with a plan quickly to increase the perception of value for the firm and to take the pressure off the executive staff and board," he said. "The board is up for election, and this won't bode well for them."
Conversely, Microsoft will most likely be rewarded for walking away from the acquisition because the market didn't like the deal, Enderle said.
"Microsoft couldn't really afford the distraction of a merger anyway, and its financials reflect that," he said. "In addition, the merger attempt opened up opportunities with News Corp. and Time Warner Inc. that may have not existed before and may actually turn out to be both less risky and, in the end, more lucrative than [a deal with] Yahoo would have been. We'll see, but I expect Microsoft will be spending some time looking into what Google was doing while it was distracted."
Microsoft
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Southern Company
Download Now
Aligning IT to Business: The Rising Importance of Application Delivery Networks
Application Delivery Networking (ADN) will play a vital role in helping enterprises incorporate strategic technologies to achieve business initiatives.
Defending Against the Storm
Download Now
Mitigate Risk, Lower Costs and Improve Network Efficiency
Create a stable IP network that not only meets today's challenges, but is flexible enough to also meet future demands.
Share our Strength
Download Now
Preparing Your Business Services for the Future
Would you trust your network monitoring tools enough to know when something is truly halting a business service?
IPAM: Slashing Network Costs
Slashing Network Costs by Consolidating and Automating Core Network Services
Essential Archive Requirements for E-Discovery
Register Now!
Horror stories: Managing IT Across Multiple Locations
How one extra sharp IT manager eliminates daily agony, hassle and repetition.
Computerworld Reports
Disaster Recovery & Cost Savings Zone
Thousands of customers world-wide have turned to virtualization solutions from Riverbed as a way to reduce costs.
